'default Graphics image
Intel Celeron M 900 2.2GHz

GD Rating

0
Check Prices
How well can the Celeron M 900 2.2GHz run games
Celeron M 900 2.2GHz Performance Specification
CPU Speed
Physical Cores
Threads
CPU Codename
TDP (Power)
Lithography
Mobo Socket
Main Link
Memory Channels
Processor GPU
CPU Details
2.2 GHz
1 cores
0 threads
Penryn
35W
45nm
Socket P
0
None
Celeron M 900 2.2GHz Game Requirement Analysis

The Celeron brand has been used by Intel for several distinct ranges of x86 CPUs targeted at budget personal computers. Celeron processors can run all IA-32 computer programs, but their performance is somewhat lower when compared to similar CPUs with higher-priced Intel CPU brands. For example, the Celeron brand will often have less cache memory, or have advanced features purposely disabled. These missing features have had a variable impact on performance. In some cases, the effect was significant and in other cases the differences were relatively minor. Many of the Celeron designs have achieved a very high bang for the buck, while at other times, the performance difference has been noticeable. This has been the primary justification for the higher cost of other Intel CPU brands versus the Celeron range.


Source [Wikipedia]
Release period
29-May-2009
Celeron M 900 2.2GHz vs Avg. AAA Game System Requirements
Avg. AAA Recommended Requirements
CPU
1335%
Graphics Card
0%
RAM
11GB
0%
VS
VS
Popular Game System Requirements
Game Min. Rec.
Red Dead Redemption 2 795% 1411%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 699% 1020%
Halo: Reach 450% 524%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 585% 1569%
Cyberpunk 2077 1020% 1184%
Borderlands 3 1102% 1411%
FIFA 20 526% 981%
Halo: The Master Chief Collection 689% 1411%
Fortnite: Chapter 2 469% 731%
eFootball PES 2020 670% 1143%
Celeron M 900 2.2GHz Extras
PC Builder
Discussion Area
The discussion area is the place where you get to chat with fellow gamers and techies.
You need to be logged in and have a GD rank of 2 or higher to join the discussion
View all discussions
X
Formatting Syntax Result
Bold **bold text** __more bold text__ bold text more bold text
Italic *italic text* _more italic text_ italic text more italic text
Strikethrough ~~strikethrough text~~ strikethrough text
Links [Game-Debate](https://www.game-debate.com) Game-Debate
Ordered List Press return twice to start your list

1. List item the first
2. List item the second
3. List item the third

Press return twice to finish your list
Press return twice to start your list
  1. List item the first
  2. List item the second
  3. List item the third
Press return twice to finish your list
Unordered Lists Press return twice to start your list

* List item the first
* List item the second
* List item the third

Press return twice to finish your list
Press return twice to start your list
  • List item the first
  • List item the second
  • List item the third
Press return twice to finish your list
Code Blocks `alert('hello world!');` alert('hello world!');
Quote Blocks > 'Tis better to have visited Game-Debate than to never have visited Game-Debate
'Tis better to have visited Game-Debate than to never have visited Game-Debate
Formatting Help
New - Ordered by date, the newest comments at the top
1
0
PC Specs
-0001
Check Prices
Your CPU CPU Comparison

GPU

0
Your GPU GPU Comparison

RAM

16 GB

0
0
/
55

This is my old laptop CPU. IT WAS SLOW. But for everyday use, it wasn't bad at all.

0
PC Specs
2012
Check Prices
$213.00
Your CPU CPU Comparison
Your GPU GPU Comparison

RAM

8 GB

0
1
/
7

This CPU is better than Pentium 4 3.8 Ghz ;)

0
PC Specs
-0001
Check Prices
Your CPU CPU Comparison

GPU

0
Your GPU GPU Comparison

RAM

16 GB

0
0
/
55

Yeah… But it was still slow… :D Glad it isn't the WORST.

0
PC Specs
2012
Check Prices
$213.00
Your CPU CPU Comparison
Your GPU GPU Comparison

RAM

8 GB

0
1
/
7

Isn't slow for 1 core :)

0
PC Specs
-0001
Check Prices
Your CPU CPU Comparison

GPU

0
Your GPU GPU Comparison

RAM

16 GB

0
0
/
55

Yeah, it was actually pretty fast for one core, but a 2 core running at 1.6 Ghz would be better :P

1

Title

Body