In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro K2000M are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GT 550M 2GB.

The Quadro K2000M was released over a year more recently than the GT 550M, and so the Quadro K2000M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GT 550M.

The Quadro K2000M and the GeForce GT 550M 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The memory bandwidth of the Quadro K2000M and the GeForce GT 550M 2GB are the same, which means the Quadro K2000M and the GT 550M have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.

The Quadro K2000M has 384 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GT 550M 2GB has 96. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro K2000M is 286 and the actual shader performance of the GT 550M is 142. The Quadro K2000M having 144 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GT 550M performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Quadro K2000M transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GT 550M. This means that the Quadro K2000M is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GT 550M.

The Quadro K2000M requires 55 Watts to run and the GeForce GT 550M 2GB requires 35 Watts. The Quadro K2000M requires 20 Watts more than the GT 550M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Quadro K2000M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GT 550M.