Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 7510M GeForce 320M
Red Dead Redemption 2 1612% 2278%
Cyberpunk 2077 2252% 3167%
Doom Eternal 1372% 1944%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 956% 1367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1612% 2278%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2252% 3167%
FIFA 20 812% 1167%
Grand Theft Auto VI 2516% 3533%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 2252% 3167%
Need For Speed Heat 1612% 2278%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 7510M are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 320M.

The Radeon HD 7510M and the GeForce 320M have the same core clock speed of 450 MHz, but the Radeon HD 7510M has 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 320M. As a result, the Radeon HD 7510M exhibits a 1.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce 320M. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon HD 7510M and the GeForce 320M have both the same core clock speed and the same Pixel Fill Rate. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon HD 7510M was released over a year more recently than the GeForce 320M, and so the Radeon HD 7510M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce 320M.

The Radeon HD 7510M has 1024 MB video memory, but the GeForce 320M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 7510M has 400 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 320M has 48. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 7510M is 90 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 320M is 45. The Radeon HD 7510M having 45 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GeForce 320M performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon HD 7510M requires 11 Watts to run and the GeForce 320M requires 23 Watts. The GeForce 320M requires 12 Watts more than the Radeon HD 7510M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce 320M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon HD 7510M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed450 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureTerascale 2 Thames LETesla MCP89
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support Poor vs Poor
Release Date07 Jan 2012vs01 Apr 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
4.2
green tick vs -
1600x900
2.9
green tick vs
2.4
1920x1080
2.1
green tick vs
1.7
2560x1440
1.5
green tick vs -
3840x2160 - vs green tick
0.1

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed800 MHzvs667 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth12.8GB/secvs21.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units400vs48
Actual Shader Performance4%vs2%
Technology40nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units20vs16
Texture Rate9 GTexel/svs7.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs8
Pixel Rate3.6 GPixel/svs3.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power11 Wattsvs23 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.0vs10.0
Shader Model5.0vs4.1
Open GL4.3vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-3110M 2.4GHzvsIntel Core i3-M330 2.13GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1024x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon HD 7510M is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Terascale Architecture.

Architecture
The Second variant of the Terascale 2 Architecture is still manufactured with a 40nm technology and despite allowing more Stream Cores, their design remains more or less the same compared to the first variant.

GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed Thames LE which has 5 Compute Units activated and thus offers 400 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit runs at 450MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 1GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The memory clock operates at 800MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for Crossfire, HD3D, Eyefinity, App Acceleration, PowerPlay and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 11W, it is suited for smaller laptops.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance somewhat below a GeForce GT 420M.

System Suggestions
We recommend a modest processor (Intel Core i3 Mobile and 4GB of RAM for a system with Radeon HD 7510M.
Overview
GeForce 320M is an Integrated Mobile Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Tesla Architecture.

Architecture
Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Tesla MCP89 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 48 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 450MHz.

Memory
The GPU also Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 256MB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Features
DirectX 10.1 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 14W, it may be used on very small notebooks.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance considerably above the desktop GeForce 210.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body