Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce FX 5700 Ultra GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Cyberpunk 2077 6213% 20079%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 5674% 18355%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 5487% 17757%
FIFA 21 3084% 10079%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 5487% 17757%
Watch Dogs Legion 5989% 19364%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 8950% 28829%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 5878% 19007%
Grand Theft Auto VI 8783% 28293%
Genshin Impact 6213% 20079%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce FX 5700 Ultra are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache was released over a year more recently than the FX 5700, and so the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the FX 5700.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The FX 5700 has 128 MB more video memory than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FX 5700 also has superior memory performance overall.

The FX 5700 has 11.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache, which means that the memory performance of the FX 5700 is slightly better than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has 4 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed475 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV36NV44
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date23 Oct 2003vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory256 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed450 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth14.4GB/secvs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs7
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2048x1536vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0bvs9.0c
Shader Model2.0vs3.0
Open GL1.5vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe top-to-bottom family of NVIDIA GeForce FX GPUs provide both high-performance gaming for enthusiasts and best-in-class features for mainstream users. Whether you're a bleeding-edge gamer who desires the most advanced gaming technology available, or a PC user in search of the perfect combination of power, performance, and value--GeForce FX solutions deliver. The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-