Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel HD Graphics 4000 Mobile Quadro FX 1600M
Red Dead Redemption 2 1429% 1954%
Halo: Reach 386% 553%
Cyberpunk 2077 2000% 2721%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1429% 1954%
Doom Eternal 1214% 1666%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2000% 2721%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 41% 21%
Grand Theft Auto VI 2236% 3038%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 2000% 2721%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 843% 1167%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD Graphics 4000 Mobile are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M.

The Graphics 4000 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 1600M, and so the Graphics 4000 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 1600M when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 1600M has 512 MB video memory, but the Graphics 4000 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Graphics 4000 has 16 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 1600M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Graphics 4000 transistor size technology is 58 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro FX 1600M. This means that the Graphics 4000 is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro FX 1600M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Graphics 4000 should consume less power than the Quadro FX 1600M.

The HD Graphics 4000 Mobile requires 55 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 1600M requires 50 Watts. The Graphics 4000 requires 5 Watts more than the Quadro FX 1600M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Graphics 4000 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Quadro FX 1600M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed650 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock1350 MHzvs-
ArchitectureIvy Bridge GT2G84M
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support Good vs -
Release Date08 Mar 2012vs01 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
3
green tick vs -
1920x1080
2.2
green tick vs -
2560x1440
1.6
green tick vs -
3840x2160
1.2
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs512 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units16vs-
Actual Shader Performance4%vs-
Technology22nmvs80nm
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate2.6 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate2.6 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power55 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.1vs10
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.0vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel HD Graphics 4000 Mobile are Integrated Graphics in some of Intel's Mobile Ivy Bridge Processors.

Architecture
The Ivy Bridge GT2 Core includes support for DirectX 11, OpenCL 1.2 and OpenGL 4.0. Additionally, it also offers Hardware Tessellation, Dedicated L3 Cache and better Video Decoding Performance, when compared to its Predecessor.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GT2 which offers 16 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 650MHz and goes up to 1350MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies from System to System. Typically, the GPU reserves 1.7GB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 800MHz.
It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Performance
The Most Powerful Variant Offers Performance similar to a dedicated GeForce GT 425M.
Select the Specific Version you have of this Graphics Card According to your Processor for a more Accurate Rank and experience using our tools.

System Suggestions
We recommend 4GB of RAM for a system with Intel HD Graphics 4000 Mobile.
The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body