Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 3 Ti 500 GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Cyberpunk 2077 6109% 20079%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 5579% 18355%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 5395% 17757%
Watch Dogs Legion 5889% 19364%
FIFA 21 3032% 10079%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 5395% 17757%
Godfall 9982% 32668%
Grand Theft Auto VI 8636% 28293%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 8801% 28829%
Genshin Impact 6109% 20079%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 3 Ti 500 are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache was released over three years more recently than the 3 Ti, and so the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 3 Ti when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 3 Ti 500 and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The 3 Ti has 1.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache, which means that the memory performance of the 3 Ti is marginally better than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The GeForce 3 Ti 500 has 4 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7. However, the actual shader performance of the 3 Ti is 1 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is 2. The GeForce 6200 TurboCache having 1 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the 3 Ti performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed240 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV20NV44
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Oct 2001vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed250 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth4GB/secvs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs7
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs9.0c
Shader Model1.1vs3.0
Open GL1.3vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce 3 Ti 500 is a very old GPU part of the GeForce 3 Series released by NVIDIA in 2001.
It only supports DirectX up to 8.1 so even DirectX 9 games are most likely unplayable.
That being said, the 128MB video memory and very low core clock doom its performance from the start. Therefore, almost all today's games are unplayable, even at the lowest settings.
The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-