Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game FireStream 9370 GeForce GTX 680
Cyberpunk 2077 257% 59%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 227% 46%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 216% 41%
FIFA 21 80% 20%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 216% 41%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 412% 128%
Watch Dogs Legion 245% 54%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 238% 51%
Grand Theft Auto VI 403% 124%
Genshin Impact 257% 59%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 are massively better than the AMD FireStream 9370.

The GeForce GTX 680 was released over a year more recently than the FireStream 9370, and so the GeForce GTX 680 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the FireStream 9370.

The FireStream 9370 has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 680, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GeForce GTX 680 has superior memory performance.

The GeForce GTX 680 has 38.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the FireStream 9370, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 680 is noticeably better than the FireStream 9370.

The FireStream 9370 has 1600 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 680 has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the FireStream 9370 is 858 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 680 is 1625. The GeForce GTX 680 having 767 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 680 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the FireStream 9370.

The FireStream 9370 requires 225 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 680 requires 195 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GeForce GTX 680, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the FireStream 9370. The FireStream 9370 requires 30 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 680 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the FireStream 9370 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce GTX 680.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed825 MHzvs1006 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1058 MHz
ArchitectureRV870Kepler GK104-400-A2
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support - vs Good
Release Date23 Jun 2010vs22 Mar 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
10
1600x900 - vs green tick
10
1920x1080 - vs green tick
8.4
2560x1440 - vs green tick
6.1
3840x2160 - vs green tick
4.5

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1200 MHzvs1502 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth153.6GB/secvs192.3GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1600vs1536
Actual Shader Performance41%vs78%
Technology-vs28nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs128
Texture Rate-vs128.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units-vs32
Pixel Rate-vs32.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power225 Wattsvs195 Watts
Recommended PSU-550 Watts & 40 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX11vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.0vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM-8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe FireStream 9370 offers maximum GPU performance with 4GB of DDR5 memory in a 2-slot configuration. The FireStream 9350 offers maximum performance / slot with 2GB DDR5 memory in a 1-slot configuration. Both boards are passively cooled and include a single Display Port output. (For workstation installations that require active cooling of the GPU, AMD’s ATI FirePro™ professional graphics boards are software compatible and offer comparable features.)GeForce GTX 680 is a high-end Graphics Card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture.
The Kepler architecture allows more SPUs but the Fermi SPUs (used on the 400 & 500 Series) are clocked twice as fast as the Kepler architecture. Therefore, don't let the large amount of Pipelines fool you, as the 1536 Pipelines are equivalent to 768 Pipelines, of the Fermi architecture.
GeForce GTX 680 features a 1006Mhz core-clock that can automatically set itself to 1058Mhz using a technology similar to the one used on Intel GPUs. Another huge surprise is the TDP that went from 244 Watts, to just 195 Watts, as two SPUs of the Kepler architecture consume 10% less power. However, the amount was doubled and so the power save is not as high as it could have been.
GeForce GTX 680 was the fastest single GPU of the world until Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition was released.
All games will run on the maximum settings smoothly.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-