Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel 865G GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Cyberpunk 2077 19725% 20079%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 18032% 18355%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 17444% 17757%
FIFA 21 9900% 10079%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 17444% 17757%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 28321% 28829%
Watch Dogs Legion 19023% 19364%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 18672% 19007%
Grand Theft Auto VI 27795% 28293%
Genshin Impact 19725% 20079%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel 865G are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache was released over a year more recently than the 865G, and so the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the 865G.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 112 MB more video memory than the 865G, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce 6200 TurboCache also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 2.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 865G, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is marginally better than the 865G.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7 Shader Processing Units but the 865G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The 865G requires 13 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed200 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureSpringdaleNV44
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 May 2003vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed-vs350 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs7
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)1280x1024vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power13 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX7.0vs9.0c
Shader Model-vs3.0
Open GL1.3vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel 865G comes embedded on the Pentium 4, Pentium D, Pentium Extreme Edition, Celeron, Celeron D CPUS and features an Integrated GPU called Intel Extreme Graphics 2.
It only supports DirectX up to 7.0 so even DirectX 8/9 games aren't (hardware) supported. The performance is ridiculous and even very old games (before 2003) might require reduced settings. Today's games are, obviously, unplayable.
The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-