Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel 865G Rage 128 Ultra 16MB
Cyberpunk 2077 19725% 28150%
Hitman 3 25689% 36650%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 18032% 25738%
Resident Evil 8 19725% 28150%
FIFA 21 9900% 14150%
Grand Theft Auto VI 27795% 39650%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 17444% 24900%
The Medium 24637% 35150%
Genshin Impact 19725% 28150%
Far Cry 6 28584% 40775%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel 865G are significantly better than the AMD Rage 128 Ultra 16MB.

The 865G was released over three years more recently than the 128 Ultra, and so the 865G is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 128 Ultra when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 865G and the Rage 128 Ultra 16MB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The 128 Ultra has 1 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 865G, which means that the memory performance of the 128 Ultra is marginally better than the 865G.

Both the 865G and the Rage 128 Ultra 16MB have 0 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

The 865G requires 13 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Rage 128 Ultra 16MB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed200 MHzvs90 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureSpringdale-
OC Potential - vs None
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 May 2003vs01 Aug 1998
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs16 MB
Memory Speed-vs130 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs1GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs-
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)1280x1024vs1600x1200
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power13 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX7.0vs6
Shader Model-vs-
Open GL1.3vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel 865G comes embedded on the Pentium 4, Pentium D, Pentium Extreme Edition, Celeron, Celeron D CPUS and features an Integrated GPU called Intel Extreme Graphics 2.
It only supports DirectX up to 7.0 so even DirectX 8/9 games aren't (hardware) supported. The performance is ridiculous and even very old games (before 2003) might require reduced settings. Today's games are, obviously, unplayable.
AMD desktop processors ignite the next generation of solutions. Whether it's playing games, cloud computing or editing home videos, enjoy a better experience with AMD multi-core processors.
Redefine the way you play on your desktop computer and take HD gaming to the extreme with the performance of ATI graphics cards from AMD.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-