Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel G43 Express Chipset All-in-Wonder 9000 64MB
Cyberpunk 2077 5550% 6109%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 5068% 5579%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 4900% 5395%
Hitman 3 7250% 7977%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7850% 8636%
FIFA 21 2750% 3032%
Far Cry 6 8075% 8884%
Genshin Impact 5550% 6109%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 8000% 8801%
Watch Dogs Legion 5350% 5889%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel G43 Express Chipset are very slightly better than the AMD All-in-Wonder 9000 64MB.

The G43 Express Chipset was released over three years more recently than the All-in-Wonder 9000 64MB, and so the G43 Express Chipset is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the All-in-Wonder 9000 64MB when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The All-in-Wonder 9000 64MB has 64 MB video memory, but the G43 Express Chipset does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The All-in-Wonder 9000 64MB has 4 Shader Processing Units but the G43 Express Chipset does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The G43 Express Chipset requires 24 Watts to run but there is no entry for the All-in-Wonder 9000 64MB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed800 MHzvs275 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureEaglelakeRV250
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Aug 2008vs01 Mar 2003
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs64 MB
Memory Speed-vs200 MHz
Memory Bus-vs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs4
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2048x1536
VGA Connections1vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power24 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs8
Shader Model4.0vs1.4
Open GL2.1vs1.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel G43 Express Chipset comes embedded on the Core 2 Quad/Core 2 Duo CPUS and features an Integrated GPU called Intel GMA X4500.
Due to its characteristics (e.g. Shared Memory) the performance is very limited but might be enough to play today's games at low settings excluding, however, very demanding games like Metro 2033 or The Witcher II, that are unplayable, even at the lowest settings.
The All-in-Wonder (also abbreviated to AIW) was a combination graphics card/TV tuner card designed by ATI Technologies. It was introduced on November 11, 1996. ATI had previously used the Wonder trademark on other graphics cards, however, they were not full TV/graphics combo cards (EGA Wonder, VGA Wonder, Graphics Wonder). ATI also makes other TV oriented cards that use the word Wonder (TV Wonder, HDTV Wonder, DV Wonder), and remote control (Remote Wonder). The All-in-Wonder line debuted with the Rage chipset series. The cards were available in two forms, built by third-party manufacturers (marked as 'Powered by ATI') as well as by ATI itself ('Built by ATI')
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-