Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce4 Ti 4600 Radeon 9250
Red Dead Redemption 2 4303% 9540%
Halo: Reach 1299% 2963%
Cyberpunk 2077 5949% 13143%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4303% 9540%
Doom Eternal 3686% 8188%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 5949% 13143%
Grand Theft Auto VI 6628% 14630%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2616% 5846%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 5949% 13143%
Need For Speed Heat 4303% 9540%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce4 Ti 4600 are massively better than the AMD Radeon 9250.

The Radeon 9250 was released over a year more recently than the Ti 4600, and so the Radeon 9250 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Ti 4600.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce4 Ti 4600 and the Radeon 9250 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Ti 4600 has 2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon 9250, which means that the memory performance of the Ti 4600 is marginally better than the Radeon 9250.

Both the GeForce4 Ti 4600 and the Radeon 9250 have 4 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs240 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV25RV280
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date06 Feb 2002vs02 Jan 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed325 MHzvs200 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth5.2GB/secvs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs8.1
Shader Model1.3vs1.4
Open GL1.3vs1.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce4 Ti 4600 is part of the GeForce4 GPUS released by NVIDIA in 2002. Only compatible with DirectX 8.1 or less and with a max memory of 128 MB, it can't play today's games.
Still, games before 2004 should be fully playable at max settings.
The Radeon R200 is the second generation of Radeon graphics chips from ATI Technologies. The architecture features 3D acceleration based upon Microsoft Direct3D 8.0 and OpenGL 1.3, a major improvement in features and performance compared to the preceding Radeon R100 design. The GPU also includes 2D GUI acceleration, video acceleration, and multiple display outputs. 'R200' refers to the development codename of the initially released GPU of the generation. It is the basis for a variety of other succeeding products.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body