Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3 Quadro FX 360M
Cyberpunk 2077 7190% 6833%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 6568% 6240%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 6352% 6035%
FIFA 21 3577% 3397%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6352% 6035%
Immortals: Fenyx Rising 5835% 5544%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 10352% 9839%
Watch Dogs Legion 6932% 6587%
Genshin Impact 7190% 6833%
Grand Theft Auto VI 10158% 9655%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 360M are marginally better than the Nvidia Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3.

The NVS 140M was released less than a year after the Quadro FX 360M, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3 and the Quadro FX 360M have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The NVS 140M has 1.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro FX 360M, which means that the memory performance of the NVS 140M is marginally better than the Quadro FX 360M.

Both the Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3 and the Quadro FX 360M have 0 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

The Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3 requires 10 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 360M requires 17 Watts. The Quadro FX 360M requires 7 Watts more than the NVS 140M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Quadro FX 360M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the NVS 140M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed400 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureG84MG86M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date05 Sep 2007vs09 May 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory256 MBvs256 MB
Memory Speed700 MHzvs600 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth11.2GB/secvs9.6GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs-
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology80nmvs80nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)1600x1200vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs-
DVI Connections1vs-
HDMI Connections1vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power10 Wattsvs17 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs10
Shader Model4.0vs4.0
Open GL3.3vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro NVS 140M is a business card with support for special drivers that are certified for professional applications like Microsoft Office Suite, Hummingbird Exceed, Lotus Notes, etc. It's part of the Quadro NVS Mobile Series released by NVIDIA, in 2006/2007/2010.
Though business cards have no driver support for games, some of them deliver astonishing performance (e.g. Quadro 6000, Tesla C2075). Quadro NVS 140M, however, isn't one of them.
The performance is enough for all old games and some modern games like the Fifa Series but it's still incapable of playing today's games like Crysis 2 and Metro 2033, even at the lowest settings.
The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-