Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3 Quadro FX 350M
Cyberpunk 2077 7190% 16277%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 6568% 14878%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 6352% 14393%
Watch Dogs Legion 6932% 15697%
Godfall 11739% 26494%
FIFA 21 3577% 8161%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6352% 14393%
Grand Theft Auto VI 10158% 22943%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 10352% 23378%
Genshin Impact 7190% 16277%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3 are massively better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 350M.

The NVS 140M was released over a year more recently than the Quadro FX 350M, and so the NVS 140M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro FX 350M.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3 and the Quadro FX 350M have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The NVS 140M has 5.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro FX 350M, which means that the memory performance of the NVS 140M is marginally better than the Quadro FX 350M.

Both the Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3 and the Quadro FX 350M have 0 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

The Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3 requires 10 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 350M requires 15 Watts. The Quadro FX 350M requires 5 Watts more than the NVS 140M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Quadro FX 350M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the NVS 140M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed400 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureG84MG72GLM
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date05 Sep 2007vs31 Mar 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory256 MBvs256 MB
Memory Speed700 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth11.2GB/secvs5.6GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs-
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology80nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)1600x1200vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs-
DVI Connections1vs-
HDMI Connections1vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power10 Wattsvs15 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs10
Shader Model4.0vs4.0
Open GL3.3vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro NVS 140M is a business card with support for special drivers that are certified for professional applications like Microsoft Office Suite, Hummingbird Exceed, Lotus Notes, etc. It's part of the Quadro NVS Mobile Series released by NVIDIA, in 2006/2007/2010.
Though business cards have no driver support for games, some of them deliver astonishing performance (e.g. Quadro 6000, Tesla C2075). Quadro NVS 140M, however, isn't one of them.
The performance is enough for all old games and some modern games like the Fifa Series but it's still incapable of playing today's games like Crysis 2 and Metro 2033, even at the lowest settings.
The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-