Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3 GeForce Go 7400
Cyberpunk 2077 7190% 13680%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 6568% 12504%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 6352% 12095%
FIFA 21 3577% 6851%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6352% 12095%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 10352% 19656%
Watch Dogs Legion 6932% 13193%
Immortals: Fenyx Rising 5835% 11120%
Grand Theft Auto VI 10158% 19290%
Genshin Impact 7190% 13680%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3 are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce Go 7400.

The NVS 140M was released over a year more recently than the GeForce Go 7400, and so the NVS 140M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce Go 7400.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The NVS 140M has 128 MB more video memory than the GeForce Go 7400, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the NVS 140M also has superior memory performance overall.

The NVS 140M has 4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce Go 7400, which means that the memory performance of the NVS 140M is marginally better than the GeForce Go 7400.

The GeForce Go 7400 has 40 Shader Processing Units but the NVS 140M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Quadro NVS 140M 256MB GDDR3 requires 10 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce Go 7400.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed400 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureG84MG72M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date05 Sep 2007vs01 Feb 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory256 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed700 MHzvs450 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth11.2GB/secvs7.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs40
Actual Shader Performance-vs1%
Technology80nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)1600x1200vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs-
DVI Connections1vs-
HDMI Connections1vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power10 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs9
Shader Model4.0vs3.0
Open GL3.3vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro NVS 140M is a business card with support for special drivers that are certified for professional applications like Microsoft Office Suite, Hummingbird Exceed, Lotus Notes, etc. It's part of the Quadro NVS Mobile Series released by NVIDIA, in 2006/2007/2010.
Though business cards have no driver support for games, some of them deliver astonishing performance (e.g. Quadro 6000, Tesla C2075). Quadro NVS 140M, however, isn't one of them.
The performance is enough for all old games and some modern games like the Fifa Series but it's still incapable of playing today's games like Crysis 2 and Metro 2033, even at the lowest settings.
GeForce Go 7400 is already a middle-class level GPU. It can use up to 128MB of dedicated video memory, plus it features DDR3 memory type. Compared to the previous GeForce Go, it's undoubtedly much better but even so, it can only handle games like F.E.A.R (from 2005) on the lowest settings.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-