In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 510 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 4290.

The Radeon HD 4290 has a 177 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce 510, but the GeForce 510 has 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon HD 4290. As a result, the GeForce 510 exhibits a 1.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon HD 4290. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon HD 4290 has a 177 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce 510 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon HD 4290 providing 0.7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 510 was released over a year more recently than the Radeon HD 4290, and so the GeForce 510 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon HD 4290.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 510 has 896 MB more video memory than the Radeon HD 4290, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce 510 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce 510 has 14.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon HD 4290, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 510 is slightly better than the Radeon HD 4290.

The Radeon HD 4290 has 40 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 510 has 48. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 4290 is 18 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 510 is 50. The GeForce 510 having 32 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 510 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon HD 4290.

The GeForce 510 transistor size technology is 15 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon HD 4290. This means that the GeForce 510 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon HD 4290. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the GeForce 510 should consume less power than the Radeon HD 4290.

The GeForce 510 requires 25 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 4290. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GeForce 510, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the Radeon HD 4290.