Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 7025 nForce 630a Radeon 9250
Red Dead Redemption 2 18672% 9540%
Cyberpunk 2077 25689% 13143%
Doom Eternal 16040% 8188%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 11479% 5846%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18672% 9540%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 25689% 13143%
FIFA 20 9900% 5035%
Grand Theft Auto VI 28584% 14630%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 25689% 13143%
Need For Speed Heat 18672% 9540%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon 9250 are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 7025 nForce 630a.

The 7025 nForce was released over three years more recently than the Radeon 9250, and so the 7025 nForce is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon 9250 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 7025 nForce has 128 MB more video memory than the Radeon 9250, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.

The Radeon 9250 has 3.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 7025 nForce, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon 9250 is marginally better than the 7025 nForce.

The GeForce 7025 nForce 630a has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon 9250 has 4. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed425 MHzvs240 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureMCP68SRV280
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Sep 2007vs02 Jan 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed-vs200 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)1920x1440vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs8.1
Shader Model3.0vs1.4
Open GL2.0vs1.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewNVIDIA GeForce motherboard GPUs (mGPUs) make experiencing the GeForce difference more affordable than ever. Designed for both AMD and Intel platforms, GeForce motherboard GPUs support the latest graphics technologies including DirectX 10, CUDA, PhysX, PureVideo HD and Hybrid SLI. The Radeon R200 is the second generation of Radeon graphics chips from ATI Technologies. The architecture features 3D acceleration based upon Microsoft Direct3D 8.0 and OpenGL 1.3, a major improvement in features and performance compared to the preceding Radeon R100 design. The GPU also includes 2D GUI acceleration, video acceleration, and multiple display outputs. 'R200' refers to the development codename of the initially released GPU of the generation. It is the basis for a variety of other succeeding products.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body