Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce Go 6200 Quadro FX 3700M
Cyberpunk 2077 20826% 823%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 19039% 744%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 18419% 717%
FIFA 21 10456% 366%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 18419% 717%
Watch Dogs Legion 20085% 791%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 29900% 1224%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 19715% 774%
Grand Theft Auto VI 29344% 1199%
Genshin Impact 20826% 823%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce Go 6200.

The Quadro FX 3700M was released over a year more recently than the GeForce Go 6200, and so the Quadro FX 3700M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce Go 6200.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 992 MB more video memory than the GeForce Go 6200, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro FX 3700M also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 48.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce Go 6200, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro FX 3700M is noticeably better than the GeForce Go 6200.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 128 Shader Processing Units but the GeForce Go 6200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce Go 6200 requires 10 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 3700M requires 75 Watts. The Quadro FX 3700M requires 65 Watts more than the GeForce Go 6200 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro FX 3700M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce Go 6200.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs550 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV44MG92M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Feb 2006vs14 Aug 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory32 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed300 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth2.4GB/secvs51.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs128
Actual Shader Performance-vs3%
Technology-vs65nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power10 Wattsvs75 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9vs10
Shader Model3.0vs4.0
Open GL2.0vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewNVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 is the mobile version of the weak GeForce 6200.
Unlike the ill-fated GeForce Go 6100/GeForce Go 6150 it doesn't use shared memory. However, it can only use up to 32 MB of dedicated memory so even old demanding games like, for example, Caesar IV might be unplayable.
The Quadro® FX 3700M high-end mobile workstation graphics solution with its revolutionary unified architecture, delivers 1 GB memory, excellent image quality, and optimized visual computing application performance pushing the limits of a 17" mobile workstation. The reference standard for OpenGL 2.1, DirectX 10, and Shader Model 4.0, Quadro FX 3700M enables next generation applications with new levels of interactivity to meet the demands of CAD engineers, graphics designers, and other technical design professionals.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-