Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game FirePro M7820 Quadro FX 3700M
Cyberpunk 2077 748% 823%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 675% 744%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 650% 717%
FIFA 21 328% 366%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 650% 717%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 1115% 1224%
Watch Dogs Legion 718% 791%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 703% 774%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1093% 1199%
Genshin Impact 748% 823%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD FirePro M7820 are very slightly better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M.

The FirePro M7820 was released over a year more recently than the Quadro FX 3700M, and so the FirePro M7820 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro FX 3700M.

The FirePro M7820 and the Quadro FX 3700M have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The FirePro M7820 has 12.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro FX 3700M, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro M7820 is slightly better than the Quadro FX 3700M.

The FirePro M7820 has 800 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro FX 3700M has 128. However, the actual shader performance of the FirePro M7820 is 364 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro FX 3700M is 70. The FirePro M7820 having 294 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FirePro M7820 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Quadro FX 3700M.

The Quadro FX 3700M requires 75 Watts to run but there is no entry for the FirePro M7820.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed700 MHzvs550 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureJuniper XTG92M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 May 2010vs14 Aug 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth64GB/secvs51.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units800vs128
Actual Shader Performance18%vs3%
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-75 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.0vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewProfessionals in the CAD (Computer Aided Design) and DCC (Digital Content Creation) industries need to be agile while being highly productive both in their office and on-the-go. AMD works with notebook vendors to provide workstation solutions to deliver advanced performance for applications across all industry segments. AMD FirePro™ professional graphics are compliant with the latest industry standards. Plus, AMD Catalyst™ professional graphics drivers are especially tuned to enable outstanding performance for many major CAD and DCC applications.The Quadro® FX 3700M high-end mobile workstation graphics solution with its revolutionary unified architecture, delivers 1 GB memory, excellent image quality, and optimized visual computing application performance pushing the limits of a 17" mobile workstation. The reference standard for OpenGL 2.1, DirectX 10, and Shader Model 4.0, Quadro FX 3700M enables next generation applications with new levels of interactivity to meet the demands of CAD engineers, graphics designers, and other technical design professionals.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants