Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 6540G2 Quadro FX 1600M
Red Dead Redemption 2 1580% 1954%
Cyberpunk 2077 2208% 2721%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 936% 1167%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2208% 2721%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1580% 1954%
Doom Eternal 1344% 1666%
FIFA 20 795% 994%
Grand Theft Auto VI 2467% 3038%
Need For Speed Heat 1580% 1954%
Halo: Reach 434% 553%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 6540G2 are noticeably better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M.

The Radeon HD 6540G2 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 1600M, and so the Radeon HD 6540G2 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 1600M when running the latest games.

The Radeon HD 6540G2 has 512 MB more video memory than the Quadro FX 1600M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the Quadro FX 1600M has superior memory performance.

The Quadro FX 1600M has 25.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon HD 6540G2, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro FX 1600M is slightly better than the Radeon HD 6540G2.

The Radeon HD 6540G2 has 560 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 1600M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Quadro FX 1600M requires 50 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 6540G2.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed400 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-G84M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date14 Jun 2011vs01 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs512 MB
Memory Speed-vs800 MHz
Memory Bus-vs128 Bit
Memory Type-vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units560vs-
Actual Shader Performance7%vs-
Technology-vs80nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11vs10
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL-vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGet the power of two when you purchase an A-Series AMD Accelerated Processor (APU) based PC with an AMD Radeon DirectX 11 capable discrete graphics card. Only AMD Radeon Dual Graphics combines two powerful Radeon DirectX11 enabled graphics processors to provide the ultimate gaming performance boost when you need it. The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body