Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel GMA 950 Quadro FX 3700M
Cyberpunk 2077 18733% 823%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 17125% 744%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 16567% 717%
FIFA 21 9400% 366%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 16567% 717%
Watch Dogs Legion 18067% 791%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 26900% 1224%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 17733% 774%
Grand Theft Auto VI 26400% 1199%
Genshin Impact 18733% 823%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M are massively better than the Intel GMA 950.

The Quadro FX 3700M was released over three years more recently than the GMA 950, and so the Quadro FX 3700M is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GMA 950 when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 800 MB more video memory than the GMA 950, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro FX 3700M also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 51.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GMA 950, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro FX 3700M is much better than the GMA 950.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 128 Shader Processing Units but the GMA 950 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GMA 950 requires 7 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 3700M requires 75 Watts. The Quadro FX 3700M requires 68 Watts more than the GMA 950 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro FX 3700M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GMA 950.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed400 MHzvs550 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureCalistogaG92M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Mar 2005vs14 Aug 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs1024 MB
Memory Speed-vs800 MHz
Memory Bus-vs256 Bit
Memory Type-vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs51.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs128
Actual Shader Performance-vs3%
Technology-vs65nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2048x1536vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power7 Wattsvs75 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9vs10
Shader Model2.0vs4.0
Open GL1.4vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe new Intel® Graphics Media Accelerator 950 (Intel® GMA 950) graphics core is an intelligent and responsive graphics engine built into the chipset that is on the motherboard. This integration provides incredible visual quality, faster graphics performance and flexible display options without the need for a separate graphics card.The Quadro® FX 3700M high-end mobile workstation graphics solution with its revolutionary unified architecture, delivers 1 GB memory, excellent image quality, and optimized visual computing application performance pushing the limits of a 17" mobile workstation. The reference standard for OpenGL 2.1, DirectX 10, and Shader Model 4.0, Quadro FX 3700M enables next generation applications with new levels of interactivity to meet the demands of CAD engineers, graphics designers, and other technical design professionals.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-