Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 4250 GeForce FX 5900XT
Halo: Reach 1366% 1347%
Cyberpunk 2077 6236% 6155%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2745% 2709%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4512% 4453%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4512% 4453%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6236% 6155%
Doom Eternal 3866% 3815%
Grand Theft Auto VI 6947% 6857%
FIFA 20 2357% 2326%
Need For Speed Heat 4512% 4453%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce FX 5900XT are marginally better than the AMD Radeon HD 4250.

The Radeon HD 4250 has a 160 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the GeForce FX 5900XT. This results in the Radeon HD 4250 providing 0.6 GTexel/s better texturing performance. Neither of these GPUs support DirectX 10 or higher, so Texture Rate holds more weight than when comparing more modern GPUs.

The Radeon HD 4250 has a 160 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce FX 5900XT and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon HD 4250 providing 0.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon HD 4250 was released over three years more recently than the GeForce FX 5900XT, and so the Radeon HD 4250 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce FX 5900XT when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon HD 4250 has 384 MB more video memory than the GeForce FX 5900XT, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GeForce FX 5900XT has superior memory performance.

The GeForce FX 5900XT has 11.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon HD 4250, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce FX 5900XT is slightly better than the Radeon HD 4250.

The Radeon HD 4250 has 40 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce FX 5900XT has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 4250 is 15 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce FX 5900XT is 2. The Radeon HD 4250 having 13 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GeForce FX 5900XT performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon HD 4250 transistor size technology is 75 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce FX 5900XT. This means that the Radeon HD 4250 is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce FX 5900XT. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon HD 4250 should consume less power than the GeForce FX 5900XT.

The GeForce FX 5900XT requires 35 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 4250.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed560 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS880NV35
OC Potential Poor vs Poor
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date30 Mar 2010vs01 Dec 2003
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed-vs350 MHz
Memory Bus32 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs11.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units40vs4
Actual Shader Performance1%vs0%
Technology55nmvs130nm
Texture Mapping Units4vs4
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs1.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs4
Pixel Rate2.2 GPixel/svs1.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2048x1536
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-35 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10.1vs9.0b
Shader Model4.1vs2.0
Open GL3.3vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 4250 (IGP) is an integrated GPU on the AMD 880G Chipset.
It's based on the RS880 Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 32-bit memory interface of either DDR2 (more commonly) or DDR3. The central unit runs, commonly, at up to 560MHz and the memory clock's operating speed depends on the system RAM's speed.
Radeon HD 4250's performance depends on the users system configuration which will define the operating memory clock's speed and on the desktop manufacturer which decides its central unit's speed.
Therefore, Radeon HD 4250 may offer similar performance to Radeon HD 4290 (and even Radeon HD 4200) but never close to the dedicated Radeon HD 4350. DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
The top-to-bottom family of NVIDIA GeForce FX GPUs provide both high-performance gaming for enthusiasts and best-in-class features for mainstream users. Whether you're a bleeding-edge gamer who desires the most advanced gaming technology available, or a PC user in search of the perfect combination of power, performance, and value--GeForce FX solutions deliver.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body