Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 4250 Radeon HD 2400 Pro
Red Dead Redemption 2 4512% 6893%
Cyberpunk 2077 6236% 9508%
Doom Eternal 3866% 5913%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2745% 4214%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4512% 6893%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6236% 9508%
FIFA 20 2357% 3625%
Grand Theft Auto VI 6947% 10586%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 6236% 9508%
Need For Speed Heat 4512% 6893%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 4250 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 2400 Pro.

The Radeon HD 4250 has a 35 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the HD 2400. This results in the Radeon HD 4250 providing 0.1 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon HD 4250 has a 35 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 2400 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon HD 4250 providing 0.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon HD 4250 was released over a year more recently than the HD 2400, and so the Radeon HD 4250 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 2400.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon HD 4250 has 256 MB more video memory than the HD 2400, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the HD 2400 has superior memory performance.

The HD 2400 has 6.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon HD 4250, which means that the memory performance of the HD 2400 is marginally better than the Radeon HD 4250.

Both the Radeon HD 4250 and the Radeon HD 2400 Pro have 40 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the HD 2400 is 21 and by the Radeon HD 4250 is 21. Knowing that the shader performance of the HD 2400 is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The Radeon HD 4250 transistor size technology is 10 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 2400. This means that the Radeon HD 4250 is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 2400. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon HD 4250 should consume less power than the HD 2400.

The Radeon HD 2400 Pro requires 20 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 4250. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the HD 2400, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the Radeon HD 4250.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed560 MHzvs525 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS880RV610
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date30 Mar 2010vs28 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs256 MB
Memory Speed-vs400 MHz
Memory Bus32 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth-vs6.4GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units40vs40
Actual Shader Performance1%vs1%
Technology55nmvs65nm
Texture Mapping Units4vs4
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs2.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs4
Pixel Rate2.2 GPixel/svs2.1 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-20 Watts
Recommended PSU-300 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX10.1vs10
Shader Model4.1vs4.0
Open GL3.3vs3.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Pentium D 940 3.2 GHz
Recommended RAM-2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-800x600

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 4250 (IGP) is an integrated GPU on the AMD 880G Chipset.
It's based on the RS880 Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 32-bit memory interface of either DDR2 (more commonly) or DDR3. The central unit runs, commonly, at up to 560MHz and the memory clock's operating speed depends on the system RAM's speed.
Radeon HD 4250's performance depends on the users system configuration which will define the operating memory clock's speed and on the desktop manufacturer which decides its central unit's speed.
Therefore, Radeon HD 4250 may offer similar performance to Radeon HD 4290 (and even Radeon HD 4200) but never close to the dedicated Radeon HD 4350. DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Radeon HD 2400 Pro is an entry-level GPU based on the 65nm variant of the second unified shader architecture, R600.
It's based on the RV610 Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 64-bit memory interface of standard DDR2. The central unit runs at 525MHz and the memory clock runs at up to 400MHz. It's therefore a higher clocked Radeon HD 2350 Pro and should only be somewhat faster.
Today's games only playable at unattractive resolutions and using low (most likely) or medium (maybe) presets. Its performance, is however, quite superior to the integrated Radeon HD 2100. DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-

Title

Body