Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 4250 GeForce 210
Red Dead Redemption 2 4512% 2753%
Cyberpunk 2077 6236% 3820%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2745% 1660%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6236% 3820%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4512% 2753%
Doom Eternal 3866% 2353%
FIFA 20 2357% 1420%
Grand Theft Auto VI 6947% 4260%
Need For Speed Heat 4512% 2753%
Halo: Reach 1366% 807%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 210 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 4250.

The GeForce 210 has a 29 MHz higher core clock speed and 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon HD 4250. This results in the GeForce 210 providing 2.5 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce 210 has a 29 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon HD 4250 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GeForce 210 providing 0.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon HD 4250 was released less than a year after the GeForce 210, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon HD 4250 and the GeForce 210 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GeForce 210 has 4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon HD 4250, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 210 is marginally better than the Radeon HD 4250.

The Radeon HD 4250 has 40 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 210 has 16. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 4250 is 15 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 210 is 22. The GeForce 210 having 7 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 210 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon HD 4250.

The GeForce 210 transistor size technology is 15 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon HD 4250. This means that the GeForce 210 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon HD 4250. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the GeForce 210 should consume less power than the Radeon HD 4250.

The GeForce 210 requires 31 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 4250. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GeForce 210, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the Radeon HD 4250.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed560 MHzvs589 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS880Tesla GT218-300-B1
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support - vs Poor
Release Date30 Mar 2010vs01 Oct 2009
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - vs green tick
2.2
1920x1080 - vs green tick
1.5
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs512 MB
Memory Speed-vs500 MHz
Memory Bus32 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsGDDR2
Memory Bandwidth-vs4GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs green tick 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units40vs16
Actual Shader Performance1%vs1%
Technology55nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units4vs8
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs4.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs4
Pixel Rate2.2 GPixel/svs2.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-31 Watts
Recommended PSU-300 Watts & 22 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX10.1vs10.1
Shader Model4.1vs4.0
Open GL3.3vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Celeron E1400 Dual-Core 2GHz
Recommended RAM-2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-1024x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 4250 (IGP) is an integrated GPU on the AMD 880G Chipset.
It's based on the RS880 Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 32-bit memory interface of either DDR2 (more commonly) or DDR3. The central unit runs, commonly, at up to 560MHz and the memory clock's operating speed depends on the system RAM's speed.
Radeon HD 4250's performance depends on the users system configuration which will define the operating memory clock's speed and on the desktop manufacturer which decides its central unit's speed.
Therefore, Radeon HD 4250 may offer similar performance to Radeon HD 4290 (and even Radeon HD 4200) but never close to the dedicated Radeon HD 4350. DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Overview
GeForce 210 is an Entry-Level Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Tesla Architecture.

Architecture
Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GT218-300-B1 which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 16 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 589MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 512MB frame buffer of DDR2, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 500MHz.

Features
DirectX 10.1 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling Solution consists of a Single-Fan.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 31W, it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for Power meaning no extra connectors are required.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance considerably below a Radeon HD 4550, meaning even the older GeForce 9400 GT is faster.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body