Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 4250 Radeon X1050
Halo: Reach 1366% 2229%
Cyberpunk 2077 6236% 9968%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4512% 7229%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2745% 4421%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4512% 7229%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6236% 9968%
Doom Eternal 3866% 6201%
Grand Theft Auto VI 6947% 11099%
FIFA 20 2357% 3804%
Need For Speed Heat 4512% 7229%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 4250 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon X1050.

The Radeon HD 4250 has a 160 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the Radeon X1050. This results in the Radeon HD 4250 providing 0.6 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since the Radeon HD 4250 supports up to DirectX 10.1.

The Radeon HD 4250 has a 160 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon X1050 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon HD 4250 providing 0.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon HD 4250 was released over three years more recently than the Radeon X1050, and so the Radeon HD 4250 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon X1050 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon HD 4250 has 384 MB more video memory than the Radeon X1050, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the Radeon X1050 has superior memory performance.

The Radeon X1050 has 5.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon HD 4250, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon X1050 is marginally better than the Radeon HD 4250.

The Radeon HD 4250 has 40 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon X1050 has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 4250 is 15 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon X1050 is 1. The Radeon HD 4250 having 14 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Radeon X1050 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon HD 4250 transistor size technology is 55 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon X1050. This means that the Radeon HD 4250 is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon X1050. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon HD 4250 should consume less power than the Radeon X1050.

The Radeon X1050 requires 24 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 4250. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Radeon X1050, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the Radeon HD 4250.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed560 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS880RV370
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date30 Mar 2010vs07 Dec 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed-vs333 MHz
Memory Bus32 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth-vs5.3GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units40vs4
Actual Shader Performance1%vs0%
Technology55nmvs110nm
Texture Mapping Units4vs4
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs1.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs4
Pixel Rate2.2 GPixel/svs1.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-24 Watts
Recommended PSU-300 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX10.1vs9
Shader Model4.1vs2.0
Open GL3.3vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 4250 (IGP) is an integrated GPU on the AMD 880G Chipset.
It's based on the RS880 Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 32-bit memory interface of either DDR2 (more commonly) or DDR3. The central unit runs, commonly, at up to 560MHz and the memory clock's operating speed depends on the system RAM's speed.
Radeon HD 4250's performance depends on the users system configuration which will define the operating memory clock's speed and on the desktop manufacturer which decides its central unit's speed.
Therefore, Radeon HD 4250 may offer similar performance to Radeon HD 4290 (and even Radeon HD 4200) but never close to the dedicated Radeon HD 4350. DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Radeon X1050 is an entry-level GFX based on the 110nm variant of the R300 architecture.
It's based on the RV370 Core and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs, on a 64-bit of standard DDR2. The central unit runs at 400MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 333MHz. Expect a TDP of up to 24 Watt.
Radeon X1050 is not related to the rest of the X1000 Series GPUs due to being based on the R300 architecture and not on the R500. Its performance is relatively limited - even for DirectX 9 based games. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body