Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Mobility Radeon HD 5145 GeForce 320M
Halo: Reach 983% 656%
Cyberpunk 2077 4582% 3167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3308% 2278%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2002% 1367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3308% 2278%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 4582% 3167%
Doom Eternal 2830% 1944%
Grand Theft Auto VI 5107% 3533%
FIFA 20 1715% 1167%
Need For Speed Heat 3308% 2278%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 320M are significantly better than the AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5145.

The Radeon HD has a 270 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce 320M, but the GeForce 320M has 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon HD. As a result, the GeForce 320M exhibits a 1.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon HD. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon HD has a 270 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce 320M, but the GeForce 320M has 4 more Render Output Units than the Radeon HD. As a result, the GeForce 320M exhibits a 0.7 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Radeon HD. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 320M was released less than a year after the Radeon HD, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Radeon HD has 1024 MB video memory, but the GeForce 320M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5145 has 80 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 320M has 48. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD is 37 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 320M is 45. The GeForce 320M having 8 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 320M delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon HD.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5145 requires 15 Watts to run and the GeForce 320M requires 23 Watts. The GeForce 320M requires 8 Watts more than the Radeon HD to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce 320M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon HD.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed720 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureM92Tesla MCP89
OC Potential Poor vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Poor
Release Date07 Jan 2010vs01 Apr 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - vs green tick
2.4
1920x1080 - vs green tick
1.7
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160 - vs green tick
0.1

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed900 MHzvs667 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth14.4GB/secvs21.3GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs green tick 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units80vs48
Actual Shader Performance2%vs2%
Technology40nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs16
Texture Rate5.8 GTexel/svs7.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs8
Pixel Rate2.9 GPixel/svs3.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power15 Wattsvs23 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10.1vs10.0
Shader Model4.1vs4.1
Open GL3.3vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Celeron U3400vsIntel Core i3-M330 2.13GHz
Recommended RAM2 GBvs2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution800x600vs1024x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewMobility Radeon HD 5145 is a middle-class GPU based on the 55nm, Terascale 1 architecture and therefore not related to other Mobility HD 5000 Series GPUs.
It's based on the M92 Core and offers 80 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs, on 64-bit memory interface of standard GDDR3. The central unit runs at 720MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 900MHz. It consumes no more than 15 Watt.
Benchmarks indicate modern demanding games of 2007-2010, such as Crysis, BF2 and Metro 2033 were only playable at low settings smoothly, using a 1024x768 resolution. Therefore, today's modern demanding games should only be playable on the lowest preset, using a 1024x768 resolution and extremely demanding modern games such as Crysis 3 might not be playable at all.
Its performance is on level with Mobility 5400 GPUs. However, as based on the Terascale 1 architecture, DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Overview
GeForce 320M is an Integrated Mobile Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Tesla Architecture.

Architecture
Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Tesla MCP89 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 48 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 450MHz.

Memory
The GPU also Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 256MB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Features
DirectX 10.1 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 14W, it may be used on very small notebooks.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance considerably above the desktop GeForce 210.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body