Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game HD i3 2357M Quadro FX 1600M
Red Dead Redemption 2 3192% 1954%
Cyberpunk 2077 4423% 2721%
Doom Eternal 2731% 1666%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1931% 1167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3192% 1954%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 4423% 2721%
FIFA 20 1654% 994%
Grand Theft Auto VI 4931% 3038%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 4423% 2721%
Need For Speed Heat 3192% 1954%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M are significantly better than the Intel HD i3 2357M.

The HD i3 2357M was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 1600M, and so the HD i3 2357M is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 1600M when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 1600M has 512 MB video memory, but the HD i3 2357M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD i3 2357M has 12 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 1600M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD i3 2357M requires 17 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 1600M requires 50 Watts. The Quadro FX 1600M requires 33 Watts more than the HD i3 2357M to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro FX 1600M may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the HD i3 2357M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed350 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureSandy BridgeG84M
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date30 May 2011vs01 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs512 MB
Memory Speed667 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth21.3GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units12vs-
Actual Shader Performance1%vs-
Technology-vs80nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections-vs-
DVI Connections-vs-
HDMI Connections-vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power17 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10.1vs10
Shader Model4.1vs4.0
Open GL3.1vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewHD i3 2357M is specific version of Intel HD 3000 graphics that is built into the 'Intel Core i3 2357M' processor. You can only play most of the latest games like Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, Batman: Arkham City, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, Crysis 2 on the lowest settings, but you might experience a small lag. Less demanding games will run from medium to high settings.The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body