Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce FX 5700 Radeon 9250
Red Dead Redemption 2 8392% 9540%
Cyberpunk 2077 11567% 13143%
Doom Eternal 7202% 8188%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8392% 9540%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 5138% 5846%
Halo: Reach 2598% 2963%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 11567% 13143%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 11567% 13143%
Grand Theft Auto VI 12876% 14630%
Need For Speed Heat 8392% 9540%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce FX 5700 are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon 9250.

The Radeon 9250 was released less than a year after the GeForce FX 5700, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce FX 5700 has 128 MB more video memory than the Radeon 9250, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce FX 5700 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce FX 5700 has 0.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon 9250, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce FX 5700 is marginally better than the Radeon 9250.

Both the GeForce FX 5700 and the Radeon 9250 have 4 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GeForce FX 5700 is 2 and by the Radeon 9250 is 1. Knowing that the shader performance of the GeForce FX 5700 is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed425 MHzvs240 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV36RV280
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Oct 2003vs02 Jan 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory256 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed250 MHzvs200 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth4GB/secvs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2048x1536vs2048x1536
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections-vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0bvs8.1
Shader Model2.0vs1.4
Open GL1.5vs1.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe top-to-bottom family of NVIDIA GeForce FX GPUs provide both high-performance gaming for enthusiasts and best-in-class features for mainstream users. Whether you're a bleeding-edge gamer who desires the most advanced gaming technology available, or a PC user in search of the perfect combination of power, performance, and value--GeForce FX solutions deliver. The Radeon R200 is the second generation of Radeon graphics chips from ATI Technologies. The architecture features 3D acceleration based upon Microsoft Direct3D 8.0 and OpenGL 1.3, a major improvement in features and performance compared to the preceding Radeon R100 design. The GPU also includes 2D GUI acceleration, video acceleration, and multiple display outputs. 'R200' refers to the development codename of the initially released GPU of the generation. It is the basis for a variety of other succeeding products.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body