Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Mobility Radeon HD 550v GeForce 320M
Red Dead Redemption 2 2196% 2278%
Doom Eternal 1874% 1944%
Cyberpunk 2077 3055% 3167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2196% 2278%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1316% 1367%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 3055% 3167%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 3055% 3167%
Grand Theft Auto VI 3409% 3533%
Need For Speed Heat 2196% 2278%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 12% 8%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Mobility Radeon HD 550v are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce 320M.

The Radeon HD and the GeForce 320M have the same core clock speed of 450 MHz, but the Radeon HD has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 320M. As a result, the Radeon HD exhibits a 7.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce 320M. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon HD and the GeForce 320M have both the same core clock speed and the same Pixel Fill Rate. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon HD was released less than a year after the GeForce 320M, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Radeon HD has 1024 MB video memory, but the GeForce 320M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Mobility Radeon HD 550v has 320 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 320M has 48. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD is 94 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 320M is 45. The Radeon HD having 49 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon HD delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce 320M.

The GeForce 320M transistor size technology is 15 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon HD. This means that the GeForce 320M is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon HD. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the GeForce 320M should consume less power than the Radeon HD.

The Mobility Radeon HD 550v requires 20 Watts to run and the GeForce 320M requires 23 Watts. The GeForce 320M requires 3 Watts more than the Radeon HD to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce 320M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon HD.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed450 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureM96Tesla MCP89
OC Potential Fair vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Poor
Release Date05 May 2010vs01 Apr 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - vs green tick
2.4
1920x1080 - vs green tick
1.7
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160 - vs green tick
0.1

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed600 MHzvs667 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth19.2GB/secvs21.3GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs green tick 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units320vs48
Actual Shader Performance5%vs2%
Technology55nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs16
Texture Rate14.4 GTexel/svs7.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs8
Pixel Rate3.6 GPixel/svs3.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power20 Wattsvs23 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10.1vs10.0
Shader Model4.0vs4.1
Open GL3.3vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-M330 2.13GHzvsIntel Core i3-M330 2.13GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1280x720vs1024x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewMobility Radeon HD 550v is a middle-class GPU based on the 55nm, Terascale 1 architecture and therefore not related to other Mobility HD 5000 Series GPUs.
It's based on the M96 Core and offers 320 Shader Processing Units, 32 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on 128-bit memory interface of standard GDDR3. The central unit runs at 450MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 600MHz. It consumes no more than 20 Watt.
Benchmarks indicate modern demanding games of 2007-2010, such as Crysis, BF2 and Metro 2033 were only playable at low settings smoothly, using a 1024x768 resolution. Therefore, today's modern demanding games should be playable on the low preset, using a 1024x768 resolution and extremely demanding modern games such as Crysis 3 might be unplayable.
However, as based on the Terascale 1 architecture, DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Overview
GeForce 320M is an Integrated Mobile Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Tesla Architecture.

Architecture
Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Tesla MCP89 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 48 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 450MHz.

Memory
The GPU also Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 256MB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Features
DirectX 10.1 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 14W, it may be used on very small notebooks.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance considerably above the desktop GeForce 210.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body