Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game G1 1050MHz GeForce 920M 2GB
Hitman 3 539% 989%
Cyberpunk 2077 391% 737%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 349% 666%
Resident Evil 8 391% 737%
FIFA 21 148% 322%
Grand Theft Auto VI 591% 1078%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 335% 641%
Genshin Impact 391% 737%
Far Cry 6 611% 1111%
The Medium 513% 944%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel G1 1050MHz are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has a 275 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the G1 1050MHz. This results in the GeForce 920M 2GB providing 8.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has a 275 MHz higher core clock speed and 5 more Render Output Units than the G1 1050MHz. This results in the GeForce 920M 2GB providing 3.7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The G1 1050MHz was released over three years more recently than the GeForce 920M 2GB, and so the G1 1050MHz is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce 920M 2GB when running the latest games.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has 2048 MB video memory, but the G1 1050MHz does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The G1 1050MHz has 256 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 920M 2GB has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the G1 1050MHz is 269 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366. The GeForce 920M 2GB having 97 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 920M 2GB delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the G1 1050MHz.

The G1 1050MHz transistor size technology is 18 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This means that the G1 1050MHz is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The G1 1050MHz requires 28 Watts to run and the GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts. The G1 1050MHz requires 3 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is not significant enough for the G1 1050MHz to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs575 MHz
Boost Clock1050 MHzvs954 MHz
ArchitectureIce LakeKepler GK208-N16V-GM
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Good
Release Date28 May 2019vs13 Mar 2015
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.4
green tick vs
6.4
1600x900
5.9
green tick vs
4.9
1920x1080
4.8
green tick vs
3.3
2560x1440
3
green tick vs
2.3
3840x2160
2.2
green tick vs
1.5

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs2048 MB
Memory Speed-vs900 MHz
Memory Bus-vs64 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs14.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 128 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units256vs384
Actual Shader Performance13%vs18%
Technology10nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs32
Texture Rate9.6 GTexel/svs18.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units3vs8
Pixel Rate0.9 GPixel/svs4.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power28 Wattsvs25 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.0
Shader Model6.4vs5.0
Open GL4.6vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 1050MHz are integrated graphics in some of Intel's Ice Lake mobile processors. It can be found in Intel Core i5-1035G1 & Intel Core i5-1034G1

Architecture
The Ice Lake architecture succeeds the Kaby lake architecture and aims for increased CPU and graphics performance.
New Features
These Gen 11 graphics solutions include the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. This lets shading time for object shading in game to be allocated more accurately by the game's developers. So for example, a graphics depicting an object that cannot easily be seen can be marked as not needing such high performance and visual accuracy and thus save processing power. GPU
The central unit initially runs at 300MHz and goes up to 1050MHz, in turbo mode.

Performance
Because performance depends heavily on the Memory Bandwidth, it may vary from system to system.
Best case scenario, expect Intel Iris Plus Graphics G1 1050MHz performance to be not as powerful as the older Iris Plus 640 onboard solution, which will reduce potential AAA gaming chances moving forward. We dont recommend this onboard solution for modern gaming.
Overview
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

Performance
GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-