Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game G1 1050MHz GeForce 9800M GT SLI
Cyberpunk 2077 391% 742%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 349% 670%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 335% 645%
Watch Dogs Legion 374% 712%
FIFA 21 148% 325%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 335% 645%
Godfall 698% 1267%
Grand Theft Auto VI 591% 1085%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 604% 1107%
Genshin Impact 391% 742%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel G1 1050MHz are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 9800M GT SLI.

The G1 1050MHz was released over three years more recently than the 9800M GT, and so the G1 1050MHz is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 9800M GT when running the latest games.

The 9800M GT has 1024 MB video memory, but the G1 1050MHz does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The G1 1050MHz has 256 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 192. However, the actual shader performance of the G1 1050MHz is 269 and the actual shader performance of the 9800M GT is 96. The G1 1050MHz having 173 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the 9800M GT performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The G1 1050MHz transistor size technology is 55 nm (nanometers) smaller than the 9800M GT. This means that the G1 1050MHz is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the 9800M GT.

The G1 1050MHz requires 28 Watts to run and the GeForce 9800M GT SLI requires 130 Watts. The 9800M GT requires 102 Watts more than the G1 1050MHz to run. The difference is significant enough that the 9800M GT may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the G1 1050MHz.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs500 MHz
Boost Clock1050 MHzvs-
ArchitectureIce LakeG92 (x2)
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date28 May 2019vs01 Jul 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.4
green tick vs -
1600x900
5.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
4.8
green tick vs -
2560x1440
3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
2.2
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs1024 MB
Memory Speed-vs800 MHz
Memory Bus-vs512 Bit
Memory Type-vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs102.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs green tick 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units256vs192
Actual Shader Performance13%vs5%
Technology10nmvs65nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs-
Texture Rate9.6 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units3vs-
Pixel Rate0.9 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power28 Wattsvs130 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs10
Shader Model6.4vs4.0
Open GL4.6vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM8 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 1050MHz are integrated graphics in some of Intel's Ice Lake mobile processors. It can be found in Intel Core i5-1035G1 & Intel Core i5-1034G1

Architecture
The Ice Lake architecture succeeds the Kaby lake architecture and aims for increased CPU and graphics performance.
New Features
These Gen 11 graphics solutions include the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. This lets shading time for object shading in game to be allocated more accurately by the game's developers. So for example, a graphics depicting an object that cannot easily be seen can be marked as not needing such high performance and visual accuracy and thus save processing power. GPU
The central unit initially runs at 300MHz and goes up to 1050MHz, in turbo mode.

Performance
Because performance depends heavily on the Memory Bandwidth, it may vary from system to system.
Best case scenario, expect Intel Iris Plus Graphics G1 1050MHz performance to be not as powerful as the older Iris Plus 640 onboard solution, which will reduce potential AAA gaming chances moving forward. We dont recommend this onboard solution for modern gaming.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a solution of two GeForce 9800M GT put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce 9800M GT to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, up to X% better than a single GeForce 9800M GT performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce 9800M GT.
A few demanding games will run at the highest settings with fluent frame rates (30+) but overall most games will require reduced settings to be played optimally.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-