Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game G1 900MHz Quadro FX 3700M
Cyberpunk 2077 402% 823%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 359% 744%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 344% 717%
FIFA 21 153% 366%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 344% 717%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 620% 1224%
Watch Dogs Legion 384% 791%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 376% 774%
Grand Theft Auto VI 607% 1199%
Genshin Impact 402% 823%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel G1 900MHz are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M.

The G1 900MHz was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 3700M, and so the G1 900MHz is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 3700M when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 1024 MB video memory, but the G1 900MHz does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The G1 900MHz has 256 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro FX 3700M has 128. However, the actual shader performance of the G1 900MHz is 230 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro FX 3700M is 70. The G1 900MHz having 160 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Quadro FX 3700M performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The G1 900MHz transistor size technology is 55 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro FX 3700M. This means that the G1 900MHz is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro FX 3700M.

The G1 900MHz requires 28 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 3700M requires 75 Watts. The Quadro FX 3700M requires 47 Watts more than the G1 900MHz to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro FX 3700M may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the G1 900MHz.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs550 MHz
Boost Clock900 MHzvs-
ArchitectureIce LakeG92M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date28 May 2019vs14 Aug 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.3
green tick vs -
1600x900
5.8
green tick vs -
1920x1080
4.7
green tick vs -
2560x1440
3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
2.2
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs1024 MB
Memory Speed-vs800 MHz
Memory Bus-vs256 Bit
Memory Type-vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs51.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units256vs128
Actual Shader Performance11%vs3%
Technology10nmvs65nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs-
Texture Rate9.6 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units3vs-
Pixel Rate0.9 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power28 Wattsvs75 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs10
Shader Model6.4vs4.0
Open GL4.6vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM8 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 900MHz are integrated graphics in some of Intel's Ice Lake mobile processors. It can be found in Intel Core i3-1000G1 & Intel Core i3-1005G1

Architecture
The Ice Lake architecture succeeds the Kaby lake architecture and aims for increased CPU and graphics performance.
New Features
These Gen 11 graphics solutions include the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. This lets shading time for object shading in game to be allocated more accurately by the game's developers. So for example, a graphics depicting an object that cannot easily be seen can be marked as not needing such high performance and visual accuracy and thus save processing power. GPU
The central unit initially runs at 300MHz and goes up to 900MHz, in turbo mode.

Performance
Because Performance depends heavily on the Memory Bandwidth, it may vary from System to System.
Best case scenario, expect Intel Iris Plus Graphics G1 900MHz performance to be not as powerful as the older Iris Plus 640 onboard solution, which will reduce potential AAA gaming chances moving forward. We dont recommend this onboard solution for modern gaming.
The Quadro® FX 3700M high-end mobile workstation graphics solution with its revolutionary unified architecture, delivers 1 GB memory, excellent image quality, and optimized visual computing application performance pushing the limits of a 17" mobile workstation. The reference standard for OpenGL 2.1, DirectX 10, and Shader Model 4.0, Quadro FX 3700M enables next generation applications with new levels of interactivity to meet the demands of CAD engineers, graphics designers, and other technical design professionals.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-