Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game 655 GT3e GeForce 920M 2GB
Cyberpunk 2077 343% 737%
Hitman 3 476% 989%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 305% 666%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 292% 641%
FIFA 21 124% 322%
Grand Theft Auto VI 524% 1078%
Far Cry 6 541% 1111%
Genshin Impact 343% 737%
Battlefield 6 476% 989%
Resident Evil 8 343% 737%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel 655 GT3e are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has a 275 MHz higher core clock speed but 16 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the 655 GT3e. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GeForce 920M 2GB manages to provide 4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has a 275 MHz higher core clock speed and 5 more Render Output Units than the 655 GT3e. This results in the GeForce 920M 2GB providing 3.7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The 655 GT3e was released over three years more recently than the GeForce 920M 2GB, and so the 655 GT3e is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce 920M 2GB when running the latest games.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has 2048 MB video memory, but the 655 GT3e does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the 655 GT3e and the GeForce 920M 2GB have 384 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the 655 GT3e is 461 and by the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366. Knowing that the shader performance of the 655 GT3e is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The 655 GT3e transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This means that the 655 GT3e is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The 655 GT3e requires 28 Watts to run and the GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts. The 655 GT3e requires 3 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is not significant enough for the 655 GT3e to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs575 MHz
Boost Clock1200 MHzvs954 MHz
ArchitectureKaby LakeKepler GK208-N16V-GM
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Good
Release Date01 Jun 2019vs13 Mar 2015
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs
green tick vs
green tick vs
green tick vs
green tick vs

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs2048 MB
Memory Speed-vs900 MHz
Memory Bus-vs64 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs14.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 128 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs384
Actual Shader Performance22%vs18%
Texture Mapping Units48vs32
Texture Rate14.4 GTexel/svs18.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units3vs8
Pixel Rate0.9 GPixel/svs4.6 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs0

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power28 Wattsvs25 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model6.4vs5.0
Open GL4.6vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GT3e are integrated graphics in some of Intel's Kaby Lake mobile processors. It can be found in Intel i7-8559U, i5-8269U, i5-8259U, i3-8109U

The Kaby Lake architecture succeeds the Skylake architecture and aims for increased CPU and graphics performance, via the same power requirements. It includes support for DirectX 12.1, OpenCL 2.1 and OpenGL 4.6.
The central unit initially runs at 300MHz and goes up to 1200MHz, in turbo mode in the Intel i7-8559U.

Because Performance depends heavily on the Memory Bandwidth, it may vary heavily from System to System.
Best case scenario, expect performance similar to the AMD Radeon RX Vega 5.
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants