Your Graphics Research
Your Graphics Research
| Recommended System Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Game | 645 GT3e | Radeon R9 M365X 4GB |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 381% | 438% |
| Hitman 3 | 526% | 600% |
| Resident Evil 8 | 381% | 438% |
| Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 340% | 392% |
| FIFA 21 | 143% | 171% |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 577% | 657% |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 326% | 376% |
| Genshin Impact | 381% | 438% |
| Far Cry 6 | 596% | 679% |
| The Medium | 500% | 571% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel 645 GT3e are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB.
The R9 M365X has a 325 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the 645 GT3e. This results in the R9 M365X providing 17.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R9 M365X has a 325 MHz higher core clock speed and 13 more Render Output Units than the 645 GT3e. This results in the R9 M365X providing 9.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The 645 GT3e was released over three years more recently than the R9 M365X, and so the 645 GT3e is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the R9 M365X when running the latest games.
The R9 M365X has 4096 MB video memory, but the 645 GT3e does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
The 645 GT3e has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640. However, the actual shader performance of the 645 GT3e is 442 and the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340. The 645 GT3e having 102 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the R9 M365X performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The 645 GT3e transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the R9 M365X. This means that the 645 GT3e is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the R9 M365X.
The 645 GT3e requires 15 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts. The R9 M365X requires 35 Watts more than the 645 GT3e to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 M365X may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the 645 GT3e.
| Core Speed | 300 MHz | vs |  | 625 MHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | | vs | - | |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 Venus PRO | |||
| OC Potential | - | vs |
| Good | |
| Driver Support | - | vs | Great | ||
| Release Date | 01 Jun 2019 | | vs | 09 Jun 2015 | |
| GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
| Approved |  | | |||
| Comparison | |||||
| 1366x768 | 7.3
|
vs | |
7.7
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600x900 | 5.8
|
vs | |
5.9
|
|
| 1920x1080 | 4.8
|
|
vs | 4.5
|
|
| 2560x1440 | 2.9
|
vs | |
3
|
|
| 3840x2160 | 2.1
|
|
vs | 2
|
|
| Memory | N/A | vs | | 4096 MB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Speed | - | vs | | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory Bus | - | vs | | 128 Bit | |
| Memory Type | - | vs | | GDDR5 | |
| Memory Bandwidth | - | vs | | 64GB/sec | |
| L2 Cache | 0 KB | vs | |
256 KB | |
| Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
| Memory Performance | 0% | |
vs | |
0% |
| Comparison | |||||
| Shader Processing Units | 384 | vs | | 640 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Shader Performance | 21% | | vs | 16% | |
| Technology | 14nm | | vs | 28nm | |
| Texture Mapping Units | 24 | vs | | 40 | |
| Texture Rate | 7.2 GTexel/s | vs | | 25 GTexel/s | |
| Render Output Units | 3 | vs | | 16 | |
| Pixel Rate | 0.9 GPixel/s | vs | | 10 GPixel/s | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | - | vs | | 4096x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Power | 15 Watts | | vs | 50 Watts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended PSU | - | - | |||
| DirectX | 12.1 | | vs | 12.0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Model | 6.4 | | vs | 5.0 | |
| Open GL | 4.6 | | vs | 4.4 | |
| Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
| Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
| SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | | yes | |
| Dedicated | no | vs | | yes | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Recommended Processor | - | Intel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended RAM | 8 GB | | vs | | 8 GB |
| Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | vs | | 1600x900 | |
| Performance Value |  | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini Review | Overview Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 GT3e are integrated graphics in some of Intel's Kaby Lake mobile processors. It can be found in Intel Core i5-8257U and the Intel Core i5-8557U Architecture The Kaby Lake architecture succeeds the Skylake architecture and aims for increased CPU and graphics performance, via the same power requirements. It includes support for DirectX 12.1, OpenCL 2.1 and OpenGL 4.6. GPU The central unit initially runs at 300MHz and goes up to 1150MHz, in turbo mode in the Intel Core i5-8557U. Performance Because Performance depends heavily on the Memory Bandwidth, it may vary heavily from System to System. Best case scenario, expect performance identical to a dedicated AMd HD 6790. | Overview Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN). Architecture Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X. Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs. GPU The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops. Performance Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X. Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250. System Suggestions Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended CPU | - | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
| GPU Variants | - | - | |||