Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra Radeon RX 560D 2GB
Cyberpunk 2077 20% 80%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 9% 65%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 6% 59%
FIFA 21 40% 9%
Grand Theft Auto VI 68% 154%
Far Cry 6 73% 161%
Genshin Impact 20% 80%
Hitman 3 56% 134%
Watch Dogs Legion 15% 74%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 71% 158%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra are significantly better than the AMD Radeon RX 560D 2GB.

The GTX 1650 has a 320 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the RX 560D. This results in the GTX 1650 providing 18 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 1650 has a 320 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Render Output Units than the RX 560D. This results in the GTX 1650 providing 27.7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 1650 was released over a year more recently than the RX 560D, and so the GTX 1650 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the RX 560D.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GTX 1650 has 2048 MB more video memory than the RX 560D, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 1650 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 1650 has 256.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX 560D, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 1650 is massively better than the RX 560D.

Both the GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra and the Radeon RX 560D 2GB have 896 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GTX 1650 is 1425 and by the RX 560D is 699. Knowing that the shader performance of the GTX 1650 is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The GTX 1650 transistor size technology is 2 nm (nanometers) smaller than the RX 560D. This means that the GTX 1650 is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the RX 560D.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra requires 90 Watts to run and the Radeon RX 560D 2GB requires 75 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 1650 and a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the RX 560D. The GTX 1650 requires 15 Watts more than the RX 560D to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GTX 1650 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the RX 560D.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 24.8 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

24.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 28.4 FPS on Metro: Exodus

Metro: Exodus

28.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 32.5 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

32.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 33.1 FPS on Assassins Creed: Odyssey

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

33.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 35.2 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

35.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 35.5 FPS on Control

Control

35.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 36.4 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

36.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 37.8 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

37.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 43.1 FPS on Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

43.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 43.5 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

43.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 45 FPS on Middle-earth: Shadow of War

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

45 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 45.6 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

45.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 45.8 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

45.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 45.8 FPS on Total War: Warhammer 2

Total War: Warhammer 2

45.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 47.7 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

47.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 51.2 FPS on Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

51.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 52 FPS on Hitman 2 (2018)

Hitman 2 (2018)

52 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 54.7 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

54.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 57.5 FPS on Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

57.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 58.9 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

58.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 59.1 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

59.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 63.9 FPS on Wolfenstein: Youngblood

Wolfenstein: Youngblood

63.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 65.6 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

65.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 69.4 FPS on Forza Horizon 4

Forza Horizon 4

69.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 95 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

95 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 7.9 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

7.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 13.4 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

13.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 17 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

17 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 17.1 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

17.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 19.8 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

19.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 20.2 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

20.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 29.5 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

29.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 37 FPS on Wolfenstein: Youngblood

Wolfenstein: Youngblood

37 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 15.6 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

15.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 20.2 FPS on Control

Control

20.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 22.6 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

22.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 22.6 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

22.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 25.6 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

25.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 29.2 FPS on Wolfenstein: Youngblood

Wolfenstein: Youngblood

29.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra gets 43.6 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

43.6 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1410 MHzvs1090 MHz
Boost Clock1590 MHzvs1200 MHz
ArchitectureTuring T106Polaris 10
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Apr 2020vs05 Jul 2017
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
10
1600x900 - vs green tick
10
1920x1080 - vs green tick
8
2560x1440 - vs green tick
5.7
3840x2160 - vs green tick
3.7

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed2002 MHzvs1750 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs-
Memory TypeGDDR6vs-
Memory Bandwidth256.3GB/secvs-
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs green tick 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs896
Actual Shader Performance69%vs34%
Technology12nmvs14nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs56
Texture Rate79 GTexel/svs61 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs16
Pixel Rate45.1 GPixel/svs17.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)7680x4320vs7680x4320
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs1
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power90 Wattsvs75 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Watts & 27 Ampsvs350 Watts & 23 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.0
Shader Model6.5vs-
Open GL4.6vs-
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-8400 6-Core 2.8GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra is an Nvidia GeForce low-end graphics card which launched in April 2020. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra is designed to compete against AMD's more affordable gaming cards such as the RX 550 and the RX 560, and replaces the outgoing GTX 1050.
This is a daul-slot graphics card which connects to the rest of the system using a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Architecture
The Turing Architecture aims for 30-50% as much performance as the previous-gen Pascal Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Turing T106, more specifically a TU106-125, which has 14 SM activated and thus 896 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1410 MHz and goes up to 1590 MHz with the Boost Clock.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of fast GDDR6, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the memory clock operates at 2000 MHz (8GHz effective).

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 90W, it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required.

Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra will enable low to mid-level graphics performance on modern AAA 2020 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 50+ FPS on medium graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution.
Comparatively, this card has slightly faster performance than the GTX 1050 Ti.

System Suggestions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ultra is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080, so our recommendation would be to use 1920x1080 in order to get the most out of your settings. We recommend a high-end processor such as the i5-8400 and 8GB of RAM for optimal performance.
Overview
Radeon RX 560D 2GB is a middle-class graphics card based on the third revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

Architecture
It equips a GPU codenamed Polaris 10 which is a 1st gen Polaris GPU, offering 896 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock operates at 1750MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it requires at least a 350W PSU and relies entirely on the PCI slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required.

Performance
This graphics card is rebrand of the Radeon RX 460 and was designed and marketed towards cryptocurrency miners and low to mid-end gaming. A light weight, small form factor GPU solution that offers mobility, so that gamers travelling to events can bring a smaller cheaper gaming rig. The Radeon RX 560D 2GB can play most modern games at medium graphics selection on a 1600p screen res and expect around 45+FPS. THe low TDP makes it a cost effective choice for cryptocurrency miners.

System Suggestions
Radeon RX 460 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a mid range CPU and 8GB of system memory for optimal performance.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-