Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 770M
Cyberpunk 2077 31% 163%
Hitman 3 70% 242%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 19% 140%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 16% 133%
FIFA 21 34% 33%
Grand Theft Auto VI 84% 270%
Far Cry 6 89% 280%
Genshin Impact 31% 163%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 87% 277%
Battlefield 6 70% 242%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M.

The GTX 1650 Ti has a 674 MHz higher core clock speed but 24 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 770M. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GTX 1650 Ti manages to provide 18.3 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 1650 Ti has a 674 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GTX 770M. This results in the GTX 1650 Ti providing 28 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 1650 Ti was released over three years more recently than the GeForce GTX 770M, and so the GTX 1650 Ti is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce GTX 770M when running the latest games.

The GTX 1650 Ti has 1024 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 770M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 1650 Ti also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 1650 Ti has 159.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 770M, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 1650 Ti is massively better than the GeForce GTX 770M.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has 1024 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 770M has 960. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 1650 Ti is 1705 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 770M is 779. The GTX 1650 Ti having 926 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 1650 Ti delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 770M.

The GTX 1650 Ti transistor size technology is 16 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GTX 770M. This means that the GTX 1650 Ti is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GTX 770M.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 770M requires 75 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 1650 Ti. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 26 FPS on Metro: Exodus

Metro: Exodus

26 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 30.3 FPS on Assassins Creed: Odyssey

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

30.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 32.2 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

32.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 32.5 FPS on Control

Control

32.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 34.6 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

34.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 39.5 FPS on Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

39.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 41.2 FPS on Middle-earth: Shadow of War

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

41.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 41.8 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

41.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 42 FPS on Total War: Warhammer 2

Total War: Warhammer 2

42 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 42 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

42 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 43.6 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

43.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 46.8 FPS on Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

46.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 47.6 FPS on Hitman 2 (2018)

Hitman 2 (2018)

47.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 52.6 FPS on Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

52.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 53.9 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

53.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 54.1 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

54.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 58.5 FPS on Wolfenstein: Youngblood

Wolfenstein: Youngblood

58.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 60.1 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

60.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 63.5 FPS on Forza Horizon 4

Forza Horizon 4

63.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 86.9 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

86.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 9.4 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

9.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 17.6 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

17.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 33.9 FPS on Wolfenstein: Youngblood

Wolfenstein: Youngblood

33.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 18.5 FPS on Control

Control

18.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 20.7 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

20.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q gets 26.7 FPS on Wolfenstein: Youngblood

Wolfenstein: Youngblood

26.7 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1485 MHzvs811 MHz
Boost Clock1665 MHzvs-
ArchitectureTuringKepler GK106-N14E-GS-A1
OC Potential - vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date31 Mar 2020vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
10
green tick vs
8.4
1920x1080
9.2
green tick vs
6.5
2560x1440
6.9
green tick vs
4.4
3840x2160
5.3
green tick vs
2.7

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs3072 MB
Memory Speed2000 MHzvs1002 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth256GB/secvs96.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 384 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1024vs960
Actual Shader Performance82%vs37%
Technology12nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs80
Texture Rate83.2 GTexel/svs64.9 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs24
Pixel Rate47.5 GPixel/svs19.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)7680x4320vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Wattsvs75 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Watts-

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model6.4vs5.0
Open GL4.6vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-9300H 4-Core 2.4GHzvsIntel Core i7-4700MQ 4-Core 2.4GHz
Recommended RAM16 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a mid-range GeForce 16 Series graphics card for laptops based on the Turing GPU architecture. It is smaller and doesn't drain the battery as fast compared to the mobile version, but it is weaker in performance.
Architecture
The Turing architecture represents a process shrink down to 12nm compared to 14nm Pascal. Unlike the RTX series, the GTX series does not support real-time ray-tracing.

GPU
It equips a Turing GPU codenamed N18P-G62, which has 1024 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs, 32 ROPs and 16 SMs. The central unit runs at 1485 MHz and goes up to 1665 MHz in Boost mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of GDDR6 through a 128-bit memory interface, while the memory clock Operates at 2000MHz, or 8GHz effective.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, this graphics card does not require a dedicated power connector.

Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q will offer a performance around 10% slower than the desktop GTX 1650 Ti. This will enable medium to high graphics performance on modern AAA 2020 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 50+ FPS on High graphics settings at 1080p screen resolution.
Comparatively, this card will have slightly faster performance than the GTX 1060 Mobile.

System Suggestions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is best suited for resolutions up to and including 2560x1440, so our recommendation would be to use 1920x1080 in order to get the most out of your settings. We recommend a modern low-end processor such as the i5-8300 and 16GB of RAM for optimal performance.
Overview
GeForce GTX 770M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Kepler GK106-N14E-GS-A1 which has 5 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 960 Shader Processing Units, 80 TMUs and 24 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 811MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 3GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 192-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1002MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Kepler Boost, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
GeForce GTX 770M is essentially a fast GeForce GTX 675MX.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is slightly better than the older GeForce GTX 675MX.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Powerful Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 770M.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-