Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q Radeon R9 M365X 4GB
Cyberpunk 2077 14% 438%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 5% 392%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 1% 376%
Grand Theft Auto VI 61% 657%
FIFA 21 42% 171%
Genshin Impact 14% 438%
Far Cry 6 66% 679%
Hitman 3 49% 600%
Watch Dogs Legion 10% 419%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 64% 671%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q are massively better than the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB.

The GTX 1660 Ti has a 515 MHz higher core clock speed and 56 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 M365X. This results in the GTX 1660 Ti providing 84.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 1660 Ti has a 515 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Render Output Units than the R9 M365X. This results in the GTX 1660 Ti providing 44.7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 1660 Ti was released over three years more recently than the R9 M365X, and so the GTX 1660 Ti is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the R9 M365X when running the latest games.

The GTX 1660 Ti has 2048 MB more video memory than the R9 M365X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 1660 Ti also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 1660 Ti has 224 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 M365X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 1660 Ti is massively better than the R9 M365X.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 1536 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 1660 Ti is 2051 and the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340. The GTX 1660 Ti having 1711 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 1660 Ti delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 M365X.

The GTX 1660 Ti transistor size technology is 16 nm (nanometers) smaller than the R9 M365X. This means that the GTX 1660 Ti is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the R9 M365X.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q requires 60 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts. The GTX 1660 Ti requires 10 Watts more than the R9 M365X to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GTX 1660 Ti to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the R9 M365X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 18.2 FPS on Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

18.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 21.9 FPS on Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

21.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 23.9 FPS on Control

Control

23.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 25.9 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

25.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 29.6 FPS on Metro: Exodus

Metro: Exodus

29.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 33.9 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

33.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 34.1 FPS on Marvel's Avengers

Marvel's Avengers

34.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 34.6 FPS on Assassins Creed: Odyssey

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

34.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 35 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

35 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 37.5 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

37.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 38 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

38 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 39.3 FPS on Horizon: Zero Dawn

Horizon: Zero Dawn

39.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 39.5 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

39.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 45 FPS on Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

45 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 45.4 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

45.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 45.7 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

45.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 47 FPS on Middle-earth: Shadow of War

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

47 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 47.4 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

47.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 47.4 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

47.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 47.6 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

47.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 53.3 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

53.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 53.3 FPS on Total War: Warhammer 2

Total War: Warhammer 2

53.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 53.4 FPS on Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

53.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 54.3 FPS on Hitman 2 (2018)

Hitman 2 (2018)

54.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 57.1 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

57.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 58.8 FPS on Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord

Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord

58.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 60.1 FPS on Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

60.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 62.9 FPS on Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider

62.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 63.2 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

63.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 66.8 FPS on Wolfenstein: Youngblood

Wolfenstein: Youngblood

66.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 72.5 FPS on Forza Horizon 4

Forza Horizon 4

72.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 13.9 FPS on Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

13.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 16.3 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

16.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 16.9 FPS on Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

16.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 18.5 FPS on Control

Control

18.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 22.7 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

22.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 22.8 FPS on Marvel's Avengers

Marvel's Avengers

22.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 23.6 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

23.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 24.2 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

24.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 26.6 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

26.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 26.7 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

26.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 29.7 FPS on Horizon: Zero Dawn

Horizon: Zero Dawn

29.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 30.5 FPS on Wolfenstein: Youngblood

Wolfenstein: Youngblood

30.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 30.7 FPS on Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord

Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord

30.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 32.7 FPS on Assassins Creed: Odyssey

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

32.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 33.3 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

33.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 34.1 FPS on Hitman 2 (2018)

Hitman 2 (2018)

34.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 41.2 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

41.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 45.5 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

45.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 48.7 FPS on Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

48.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 59.2 FPS on Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider

59.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 61.3 FPS on Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1

61.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 6 FPS on Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077

6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 8.3 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

8.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 9 FPS on Control

Control

9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 11.7 FPS on Marvel's Avengers

Marvel's Avengers

11.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 14 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

14 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 14.1 FPS on Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord

Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord

14.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 14.1 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

14.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 16.2 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

16.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 16.6 FPS on Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

16.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 16.6 FPS on Horizon: Zero Dawn

Horizon: Zero Dawn

16.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 17.8 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

17.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 17.8 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

17.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 20.7 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

20.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 21.1 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

21.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 22.7 FPS on Hitman 2 (2018)

Hitman 2 (2018)

22.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 30.8 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

30.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q gets 38.6 FPS on Wolfenstein: Youngblood

Wolfenstein: Youngblood

38.6 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1140 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock1335 MHzvs-
ArchitectureTuringGCN 1.0 Venus PRO
OC Potential - vs Good
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date23 Apr 2019vs09 Jun 2015
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs
7.7
1600x900
10
green tick vs
5.9
1920x1080
9.8
green tick vs
4.5
2560x1440
7.4
green tick vs
3
3840x2160
5.6
green tick vs
2

GPU Memory

Memory6144 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1500 MHzvs1000 MHz
Memory Bus192 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth288GB/secvs64GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 256 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1536vs640
Actual Shader Performance99%vs16%
Technology12nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units96vs40
Texture Rate109.4 GTexel/svs25 GTexel/s
Render Output Units48vs16
Pixel Rate54.7 GPixel/svs10 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)3840x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power60 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model6.5vs5.0
Open GL4.6vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-9300H 4-Core 2.4GHzvsIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz
Recommended RAM16 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a mid-range GeForce 16 Series graphics card for laptops based on the Turing GPU architecture. It is smaller and doesn't drain the battery as fast compared to the mobile version, but it is weaker in performance. Architecture The Turing architecture represents a process shrink down to 12nm compared to 14nm Pascal. Unlike the RTX series, the GTX series does not support real-time ray-tracing. GPU It equips a Turing GPU codenamed TU116, which has 1536 Shader Processing Units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs and 24 SMs. The central unit runs at 1455 MHz and goes up to 1590 MHz in Boost mode. Memory The GPU accesses a 6GB frame buffer of first-gen GDDR6 memory through a 192-bit memory interface, while the Memory clock operates at 1500MHz, or 12GHz effective. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 80W the GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is averagely resource-intensive and will fairly significantly reduce laptop battery life at full load. System Suggestions GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a mid-range Processor and at least 16GB of RAM for optimal performance.Overview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).



Architecture
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-