Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel GMA 3150 GeForce Go 7200
Red Dead Redemption 2 15186% 18348%
Cyberpunk 2077 20900% 25245%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 9329% 11279%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 20900% 25245%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 15186% 18348%
Doom Eternal 13043% 15762%
FIFA 20 8043% 9728%
Grand Theft Auto VI 23257% 28090%
Need For Speed Heat 15186% 18348%
Halo: Reach 4757% 5762%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel GMA 3150 are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce Go 7200.

The GMA 3150 was released over three years more recently than the GeForce Go 7200, and so the GMA 3150 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce Go 7200 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GMA 3150 has 320 MB more video memory than the GeForce Go 7200, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GeForce Go 7200 has superior memory performance.

The GeForce Go 7200 has 2.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GMA 3150, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce Go 7200 is marginally better than the GMA 3150.

Both the GMA 3150 and the GeForce Go 7200 have 0 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

The GMA 3150 requires 50 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce Go 7200.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed200 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitecturePineviewG72M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Oct 2010vs01 Sep 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs64 MB
Memory Speed-vs350 MHz
Memory Bus-vs32 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs-
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)1600x1200vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections-vs-
HDMI Connections-vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9vs9
Shader Model3.0vs3.0
Open GL1.5vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Intel Graphics Media Accelerator, or GMA, is Intel's current line of integrated graphics processors built into various motherboard chipsets.
These integrated graphics products allow a computer to be built without a separate graphics card, which can reduce cost, power consumption and noise. They are commonly found on low-priced notebook and desktop computers as well as business computers, which do not need high levels of graphics capability. 90% of all PCs sold have integrated graphics. They rely on the computer's main memory for storage, which imposes a performance penalty, as both the CPU and GPU have to access memory over the same bus.
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200 is the weakest GPU in the GeForce 7000 Series. With only up to 32MB of dedicated memory, it's already doomed from the start.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body