| Recommended System Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Game | Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB | Radeon RX 5700 XT Gigabyte 8GB |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 42% | 42% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 42% | 42% |
| Halo: Reach | 81% | 81% |
| Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order | 20% | 20% |
| FIFA 20 | 69% | 69% |
| Borderlands 3 | 38% | 38% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20% | 20% |
| Zombieland: Double Tap - Road Trip | 46% | 46% |
| Halo: The Master Chief Collection | 33% | 33% |
| eFootball PES 2020 | 60% | 60% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the RX 5700 XT and the RX 5700 XT are equal.
The RX 5700 XT has a 45 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the RX 5700 XT. This results in the RX 5700 XT providing 7.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The RX 5700 XT has a 45 MHz higher core clock speed than the RX 5700 XT and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the RX 5700 XT providing 2.9 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The RX 5700 XT was released less than a year after the RX 5700 XT, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB and the Radeon RX 5700 XT Gigabyte 8GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The memory bandwidth of the Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB and the Radeon RX 5700 XT Gigabyte 8GB are the same, which means the RX 5700 XT and the RX 5700 XT have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.
Both the Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB and the Radeon RX 5700 XT Gigabyte 8GB have 2560 Shader Processing Units. Having the same number of SPUs and using the same architecture means that the performance they offer can be compared by looking at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, the RX 5700 XT has 7.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate and 2.9 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate, but the has GB/sec greater memory bandwidth. Although the GPUs are very similar in performance, the RX 5700 XT takes the edge.
The Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB requires 225 Watts to run and the Radeon RX 5700 XT Gigabyte 8GB requires 225 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the RX 5700 XT and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the RX 5700 XT. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.
Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB gets 65.7 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands
Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB gets 112.1 FPS on Middle-earth: Shadow of War
Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB gets 155.9 FPS on PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds
Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB gets 200+ FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus
Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB gets 41.6 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands
Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB gets 82.3 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus
Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB gets 53.3 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands
Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB gets 90.9 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus
| Core Speed | 1650 MHz |  | vs | 1605 MHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boost Clock | 1905 MHz | | vs | | 1905 MHz |
| Architecture | Navi 10 XL | Navi 10 XL | |||
| OC Potential | - | vs | - | ||
| Driver Support | - | vs | - | ||
| Release Date | 07 Aug 2019 |  | vs | 07 Jul 2019 | |
| GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
| Approved |  | | |||
| Comparison | |||||
| 1366x768 | 10
|
|
vs | |
10
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600x900 | 10
|
|
vs | |
10
|
| 1920x1080 | 10
|
|
vs | |
10
|
| 2560x1440 | 9.9
|
|
vs | |
9.9
|
| 3840x2160 | 7.7
|
|
vs | |
7.7
|
| Memory | 8192 MB | | vs | | 8192 MB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz | | vs | | 1750 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 256 Bit | | vs | | 256 Bit |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | | vs | | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448GB/sec | | vs | | 448GB/sec |
| L2 Cache | 0 KB | |
vs | |
0 KB |
| Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
| Memory Performance | 0% | |
vs | |
0% |
| Comparison | |||||
| Shader Processing Units | 2560 | | vs | | 2560 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Shader Performance | 100% | | vs | | 100% |
| Technology | 7nm | | vs | | 7nm |
| Texture Mapping Units | 160 | | vs | | 160 |
| Texture Rate | 264 GTexel/s | | vs | 256.8 GTexel/s | |
| Render Output Units | 64 | | vs | | 64 |
| Pixel Rate | 105.6 GPixel/s | | vs | 102.7 GPixel/s | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 7680x4320 | | vs | | 7680x4320 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| HDMI Connections | 1 | | vs | | 1 |
| DisplayPort Connections | 3 | | vs | | 3 |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Power | 225 Watts | | vs | | 225 Watts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended PSU | 600 Watts & 42 Amps | | vs | | 600 Watts & 42 Amps |
| DirectX | 12 | | vs | | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Model | 5.0 | | vs | | 5.0 |
| Open GL | 4.5 | | vs | | 4.5 |
| Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
| Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
| SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
| Dedicated | yes | | vs | | yes |
| Comparison | |||||
| Recommended Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended RAM | 16 GB | | vs | | 16 GB |
| Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 3840x2160 | | vs | | 3840x2160 |
| Performance Value |  | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini Review | Overview The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB is an Enthusiast gaming Graphics Card based on the first (1.0) Revision of the RDNA Architecture. Architecture The Navi 10 XL GPU offers support for GDDR6 Memory, DirectX 12.0, Vulkan 1.0, and OpenGL 4.5. This variant of the Navi 10 XL GPU features 40 Compute Units activated, offering 2560 Shader Processing Units, 160 TMUs and 64 ROPs. The GPU features a 1605 MHz base clock speed and up to 1905 MHz with boost clock, making it an estimated 15% faster than a Radeon RX Vega 64. This puts its predicted performance roughly in line with the GeForce RTX 2080. GPU The Central Unit is clocked at 1650 MHz, rising to 1905 MHz with boost clock enabled. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with high-speed GDDR6 and accesses the Frame Buffer through a 256-bit memory interface, providing total memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 8GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However,the GPU itself is aimed for 4K Gaming, In some limited scenarios, 8GB might be a bottleneck and Performance could be better were the Frame Buffer larger, however this would only be an issue in the most demanding games. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 225W, it requires at least a 600W PSU with one available 8+6-pin connector. Performance The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB competes with GeForce RTX 2070 8GB, which is available for $599. Specs currently available suggest the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB performance should be in the same region as the GeForce RTX 2070. System Suggestions The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Kuroutoshikou Dual Fan 8GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 3840 x2160 (4K). For the most demanding AAA games it should be ideally suited to 4K. We recommend a Very Strong Processor and at least 16GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | Overview The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Gigabyte 8GB is an Enthusiast gaming Graphics Card based on the first (1.0) Revision of the RDNA Architecture. Architecture The Navi 10 XL GPU offers support for GDDR6 Memory, DirectX 12.0, Vulkan 1.0, and OpenGL 4.5. This variant of the Navi 10 XL GPU features 40 Compute Units activated, offering 2560 Shader Processing Units, 160 TMUs and 64 ROPs. The GPU features a 1605 MHz base clock speed and up to 1905 MHz with boost clock, making it an estimated 15% faster than a Radeon RX Vega 64. This puts its predicted performance roughly in line with the GeForce RTX 2080. GPU The Central Unit is clocked at 1605 MHz, rising to 1905 MHz with boost clock enabled. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with high-speed GDDR6 and accesses the Frame Buffer through a 256-bit memory interface, providing total memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 8GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However,the GPU itself is aimed for 4K Gaming, In some limited scenarios, 8GB might be a bottleneck and Performance could be better were the Frame Buffer larger, however this would only be an issue in the most demanding games. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 225W, it requires at least a 600W PSU with one available 8+6-pin connector. Performance The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Gigabyte 8GB competes with GeForce RTX 2070 8GB, which is available for $599. Specs currently available suggest the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Gigabyte 8GB performance should be in the same region as the GeForce RTX 2070. System Suggestions The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Gigabyte 8GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 3840 x2160 (4K). For the most demanding AAA games it should be ideally suited to 4K. We recommend a Very Strong Processor and at least 16GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended CPU | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possible GPU Upgrades | |||||
| GPU Variants | - | - | |||
