| Recommended System Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Game | Radeon RX 5700 MSI Evoke OC 8GB | GeForce GTX 2050 Ti 4GB |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 37% | 14% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 37% | 14% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 13% | 57% |
| Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order | 13% | 57% |
| Halo: Reach | 80% | 64% |
| Borderlands 3 | 33% | 20% |
| FIFA 20 | 66% | 39% |
| eFootball PES 2020 | 57% | 22% |
| Fortnite: Chapter 2 | 71% | 48% |
| Detroit: Become Human | 4% | 73% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 MSI Evoke OC 8GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 2050 Ti 4GB.
The RX 5700 has a 175 MHz higher core clock speed and 96 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 2050 Ti. This results in the RX 5700 providing 149.1 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The RX 5700 has a 175 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Render Output Units than the GTX 2050 Ti. This results in the RX 5700 providing 52.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The RX 5700 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 2050 Ti, and so the RX 5700 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 2050 Ti when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The RX 5700 has 4096 MB more video memory than the GTX 2050 Ti, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the RX 5700 also has superior memory performance overall.
The RX 5700 has 335.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 2050 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the RX 5700 is massively better than the GTX 2050 Ti.
The Radeon RX 5700 MSI Evoke OC 8GB has 2304 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 2050 Ti 4GB has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the RX 5700 is 2621 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 2050 Ti is 1069. The RX 5700 having 1552 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the RX 5700 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 2050 Ti.
The RX 5700 transistor size technology is 9 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 2050 Ti. This means that the RX 5700 is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 2050 Ti.
The Radeon RX 5700 MSI Evoke OC 8GB requires 225 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 2050 Ti 4GB requires 75 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the RX 5700 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 2050 Ti. The RX 5700 requires 150 Watts more than the GTX 2050 Ti to run. The difference is significant enough that the RX 5700 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 2050 Ti.
| Core Speed | 1465 MHz |  | vs | 1290 MHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boost Clock | 1750 MHz | | vs | 1392 MHz | |
| Architecture | Navi 10 XL | Turing T107 | |||
| OC Potential | - | vs | - | ||
| Driver Support | - | vs | - | ||
| Release Date | 23 Aug 2019 |  | vs | 30 Nov -0001 | |
| GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
| Approved |  | | |||
| Comparison | |||||
| 1366x768 | 10
|
|
vs | |
10
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600x900 | 10
|
|
vs | |
10
|
| 1920x1080 | 10
|
|
vs | 9.6
|
|
| 2560x1440 | 9.7
|
|
vs | 7
|
|
| 3840x2160 | 7.6
|
|
vs | 5.3
|
|
| Memory | 8192 MB | | vs | 4096 MB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz | vs | | 1752 MHz | |
| Memory Bus | 256 Bit | | vs | 128 Bit | |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | | vs | GDDR5 | |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448GB/sec | | vs | 112.1GB/sec | |
| L2 Cache | 0 KB | |
vs | |
0 KB |
| Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
| Memory Performance | 0% | |
vs | |
0% |
| Comparison | |||||
| Shader Processing Units | 2304 | | vs | 768 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Shader Performance | 100% | | vs | 51% | |
| Technology | 7nm | | vs | 16nm | |
| Texture Mapping Units | 144 | | vs | 48 | |
| Texture Rate | 211 GTexel/s | | vs | 61.9 GTexel/s | |
| Render Output Units | 64 | | vs | 32 | |
| Pixel Rate | 93.8 GPixel/s | | vs | 41.3 GPixel/s | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 7680x4320 | | vs | | 7680x4320 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DVI Connections | 0 | vs | | 1 | |
| HDMI Connections | 1 | | vs | | 1 |
| DisplayPort Connections | 3 | | vs | 1 | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Power | 225 Watts | vs | | 75 Watts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended PSU | 750 Watts & 42 Amps | vs | | 300 Watts & 27 Amps | |
| DirectX | 12 | vs | | 12.1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Model | 5.0 | | vs | | 5 |
| Open GL | 4.5 | | vs | | 4.5 |
| Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
| Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
| SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
| Dedicated | yes | | vs | | yes |
| Comparison | |||||
| Recommended Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | - | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended RAM | 16 GB | vs | | 12 GB | |
| Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 2560x1440 | | vs | 1920x1080 | |
| Performance Value |  | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini Review | Overview The AMD Radeon RX 5700 MSI Evoke OC 8GB is an Enthusiast gaming Graphics Card based on the first (1.0) Revision of the RDNA Architecture. Architecture The Navi 10 XL GPU offers support for GDDR6 Memory, DirectX 12.0, Vulkan 1.0, and OpenGL 4.5. This variant of the Navi 10 XL GPU features 36 Compute Units activated, offering 2304 Shader Processing Units, 144 TMUs and 64 ROPs. The GPU features a 1465 MHz base clock speed and up to 1725 MHz with boost clock, making it an estimated 15% faster than a GeForce RTX 2060. This puts its predicted performance roughly in line with the Radeon RX Vega 64. GPU The Central Unit is clocked at 1465 MHz, rising to 1750 MHz with boost clock enabled.. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with high-speed GDDR6 and accesses the Frame Buffer through a 256-bit memory interface, providing total memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 8GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However,the GPU itself is aimed for 4K Gaming, In some limited scenarios, 8GB might be a bottleneck and Performance could be better were the Frame Buffer larger, however this would only be an issue in the most demanding games. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 225W, it requires at least a 750W PSU with one available 8+6-pin connector. Performance The AMD Radeon RX 5700 MSI Evoke OC 8GB competes with GeForce RTX 2070 8GB, which is available for $499. Specs currently available suggest the AMD Radeon RX 5700 MSI Evoke OC 8GB performance should be in the same region as the Radeon RX Vega 64. System Suggestions The AMD Radeon RX 5700 MSI Evoke OC 8GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 3840 x2160 (4K). For the most demanding AAA games it should be ideally suited to 1440p. We recommend a Very Strong Processor and at least 16GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | Overview The GeForce GTX 2050 Ti is a rumoured Nvidia lower-end Turing graphics card that will be announced in 2019. It is competing against AMDs more affordable gaming cards. Architecture The Turing Architecture aims for 30-50% as much performance as the previous-gen Pascal Architecture. GPU It equips a GPU codenamed GT107 which has [xxx] SM activated and [xxx] Shader Processing Units, [xxx] TMUs and [xxx] ROPs. The central unit runs at [xxx]MHz and goes up to [xxx]MHz when the Boost Clock is triggered in game. Memory The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5 through a 128-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock Operates at 3504MHz. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 75W, it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required. Performance The GTX 2050 Ti will enable mid-level graphics performance on modern AAA 2019 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 55+ FPS on medium graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution. Comparatively, this card will be faster than the performance of the outgoing GTX 1050 Ti System Suggestions GeForce GTX 2050 Ti is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a modern CPU like the i5-7500 and 12GB of RAM for minimal system bottleneck. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended CPU | - | - | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
| GPU Variants | - | - | |||
