Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 6250 GeForce 8200M G
Halo: Reach 1832% 4622%
Cyberpunk 2077 8252% 20317%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 3650% 9067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5980% 14761%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5980% 14761%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 8252% 20317%
Doom Eternal 5127% 12678%
Grand Theft Auto VI 9190% 22608%
FIFA 20 3139% 7817%
Need For Speed Heat 5980% 14761%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 6250 are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 8200M G.

The Radeon HD 6250 was released over a year more recently than the GeForce 8200M G, and so the Radeon HD 6250 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce 8200M G.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon HD 6250 has 256 MB video memory, but the GeForce 8200M G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 6250 has 80 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 8200M G has 8. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 6250 is 15 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 8200M G is 3. The Radeon HD 6250 having 12 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon HD 6250 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce 8200M G.

The Radeon HD 6250 requires 9 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce 8200M G.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed280 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureZacate-
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date09 Nov 2010vs01 Jun 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/AvsN/A
Memory Speed-vs-
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vs-
Memory Bandwidth-vs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units80vs8
Actual Shader Performance1%vs0%
Technology40nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power9 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11vs10
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.1vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Celeron P4505-
Recommended RAM2 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution800x600-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 6250 is an integrated GPU in one of the Zacate Processors, based on the 40nm Terrascale 2 architecture.
It's based on the Cedar Core (therefore related to Radeon HD 6350) and offers 80 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. Both the operating memory clock's speed and bus width will depend on the system's RAM configuration and speed. Its central clock runs at up to 280MHz.
Its performance is very limited and so today's modern games can only be played using very low resolutions such as 800x680 - 1024x768 or are unplayable at all.
GeForce 8400M GT is an on-board GPU part of the 8000M Series released by NVIDIA, in 2007.
Only less demanding games can be played smoothly.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body