Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB GeForce GTX 660 Ti 3-way SLI
Cyberpunk 2077 25% 7%
Hitman 3 63% 20%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 15% 15%
The Medium 56% 16%
Resident Evil 8 25% 7%
FIFA 21 37% 53%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 11% 18%
Grand Theft Auto VI 76% 30%
Genshin Impact 25% 7%
Far Cry 6 81% 34%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 3-way SLI are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB.

The GTX 1650 has a 570 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 660 Ti, but the GTX 660 Ti has 280 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 1650. As a result, the GTX 660 Ti exhibits a 224.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 1650. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 1650 has a 570 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 660 Ti, but the GTX 660 Ti has 40 more Render Output Units than the GTX 1650. As a result, the GTX 660 Ti exhibits a 18.4 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 1650. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 1650 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 660 Ti, and so the GTX 1650 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 660 Ti when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GTX 660 Ti has 2048 MB more video memory than the GTX 1650, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 660 Ti also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 660 Ti has 304.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 1650, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 660 Ti is massively better than the GTX 1650.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB has 896 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 660 Ti 3-way SLI has 4032. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 1650 is 1505 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 660 Ti is 3951. The GTX 660 Ti having 2446 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 660 Ti delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 1650.

The GTX 1650 transistor size technology is 16 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 660 Ti. This means that the GTX 1650 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 660 Ti.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 660 Ti 3-way SLI requires 450 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 1650. The GTX 660 Ti requires 375 Watts more than the GTX 1650 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 660 Ti may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 1650.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 21.8 FPS on Control

Control

21.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 23.6 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

23.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 31 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

31 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 32 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

32 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 34.3 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

34.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 34.7 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

34.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 41.5 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

41.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 41.8 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

41.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 43.3 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

43.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 43.3 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

43.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 48.7 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

48.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 48.7 FPS on Total War: Warhammer 2

Total War: Warhammer 2

48.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 52.2 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

52.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 57.8 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

57.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 7.6 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

7.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 12.8 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

12.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 16.2 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

16.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 16.3 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

16.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 18.9 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

18.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 19.3 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

19.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 28.1 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

28.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 14.9 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

14.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 16.9 FPS on Control

Control

16.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 21.6 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

21.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 22.1 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

22.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 24.4 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

24.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB gets 41.6 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

41.6 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1485 MHzvs915 MHz
Boost Clock1680 MHzvs980 MHz
ArchitectureTuring T107Kepler GK104-200-KD-A2 (x3)
OC Potential - vs Good
Driver Support - vs Good
Release Date27 Apr 2019vs01 Aug 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
10
green tick vs -
1920x1080
9.4
vs green tick
10
2560x1440
7.1
green tick vs -
3840x2160
5.5
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs6144 MB
Memory Speed2002 MHzvs1502 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs576 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth128.1GB/secvs432.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 1152 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs4032
Actual Shader Performance72%vs100%
Technology12nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs336
Texture Rate83.2 GTexel/svs307.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs72
Pixel Rate47.5 GPixel/svs65.9 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)7680x4320vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections1vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Wattsvs450 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 27 Amps-

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.0
Shader Model5.4vs5.0
Open GL4.6vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-8400 6-Core 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i5-3570K 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
The GeForce GTX 1650 is an Nvidia GeForce low-end graphics card which launched in April 2019. The GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB is designed to compete against AMD's more affordable gaming cards such as the RX 550 and the RX 560, and replaces the outgoing GTX 1050.
This is a dual-slot graphics card which connects to the rest of the system using a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. The GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB features a dual 80mm fan cooling solution. This graphics card has below average overclocking potential.
Architecture
The Turing Architecture aims for 30-50% as much performance as the previous-gen Pascal Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Turing TU117-400, more specifically a TU117-300-A1, which has 14 SM activated and thus 896 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1485 MHz and goes up to 1665 MHz with the Boost Clock, providing a small 1% overclock versus the reference model.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the memory clock operates at 2000 MHz (8GHz effective).

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required.

Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB will enable low to mid-level graphics performance on modern AAA 2019 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 50+ FPS on medium graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution.
Comparatively, this card has slightly faster performance than the GTX 1050 Ti.

System Suggestions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Galax EX 1-Click OC 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080, so our recommendation would be to use 19200x1080 in order to get the most out of your settings. We recommend a high-end processor such as the i5-8400 and 8GB of RAM for optimal performance.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti 3-way SLI is a solution of three GeForce GTX 660 Ti put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 660 Ti to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to X% better than a single GeForce GTX 660 Ti performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 660 Ti. Expect this combination to draw up to 450 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-