3.4
Check Prices $165.00
3
Check Prices
Estimated Price:
$149.99
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB GeForce GTX 2050
Cyberpunk 2077 25% 50%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 15% 39%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 28% 54%
Genshin Impact 26% 52%
eFootball PES 2021 37% 23%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 80% 117%
Watch Dogs Legion 21% 46%
FIFA 21 37% 23%
Marvel's Avengers 19% 44%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 11% 34%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 2050.

The GTX 1650 has a 131 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 2050. This results in the GTX 1650 providing 29 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 1650 has a 131 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 2050 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 1650 providing 4.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 1650 was released over three years more recently than the GeForce GTX 2050, and so the GTX 1650 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce GTX 2050 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB and the GeForce GTX 2050 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GTX 1650 has 16 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 2050, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 1650 is slightly better than the GeForce GTX 2050.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB has 896 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 2050 has 640. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 1650 is 1492 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 2050 is 931. The GTX 1650 having 561 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 1650 delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 2050.

The GTX 1650 transistor size technology is 2 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GTX 2050. This means that the GTX 1650 is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GTX 2050.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 2050 requires 75 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 1650 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GeForce GTX 2050. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 21.8 FPS on Control

Control

21.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 18 FPS on Control

Control

18 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 30.9 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

30.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 25.6 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

25.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 31.9 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

31.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 26.4 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

26.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 34.2 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

34.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 28.3 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

28.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 34.6 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

34.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 28.7 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

28.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 41.4 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

41.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 34.3 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

34.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 41.6 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

41.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 34.5 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

34.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 43.2 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

43.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 35.8 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

35.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 43.2 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

43.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 35.8 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

35.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 48.5 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

48.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 40.2 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

40.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 48.5 FPS on Total War: Warhammer 2

Total War: Warhammer 2

48.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 40.2 FPS on Total War: Warhammer 2

Total War: Warhammer 2

40.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 52.1 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

52.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 43.1 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

43.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 57.6 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

57.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 47.7 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

47.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 12.8 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

12.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 10.6 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

10.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 16.2 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

16.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 13.4 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

13.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 16.2 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

16.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 13.5 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

13.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 18.9 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

18.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 15.6 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

15.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 19.2 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

19.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 15.9 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

15.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 28 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

28 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 23.2 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

23.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 16.8 FPS on Control

Control

16.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 14 FPS on Control

Control

14 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 21.5 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

21.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 17.8 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

17.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 22 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

22 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 18.3 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

18.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 24.4 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

24.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 20.2 FPS on Death Stranding

Death Stranding

20.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB gets 41.4 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

41.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 2050 gets 34.3 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

34.3 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1485 MHzvs1354 MHz
Boost Clock1665 MHzvs1455 MHz
ArchitectureTuring T107Turing T107
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date27 Apr 2019vs30 Nov -0001
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1920x1080
9.4
green tick vs
8.6
2560x1440
7.1
green tick vs
6.3
3840x2160
5.5
green tick vs
4.7

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed2002 MHzvs1752 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth128.1GB/secvs112.1GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs green tick 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs640
Actual Shader Performance72%vs45%
Technology12nmvs14nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs40
Texture Rate83.2 GTexel/svs54.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs32
Pixel Rate47.5 GPixel/svs43.3 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)7680x4320vs7680x4320
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs1
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Wattsvs75 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 27 Ampsvs300 Watts & 27 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.1
Shader Model5.4vs5
Open GL4.6vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-8400 6-Core 2.8GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
The GeForce GTX 1650 is an Nvidia GeForce low-end graphics card which launched in April 2019. The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB is designed to compete against AMD's more affordable gaming cards such as the RX 550 and the RX 560, and replaces the outgoing GTX 1050.
This is a dual-slot graphics card which connects to the rest of the system using a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB features a single-fan cooling solution, mini-ITX form factor, and Expertool II compatability. This graphics card has poor overclocking potential. Its small size means this graphics card is an ideal choice for a small-form-factor (SFF) PC build.
Architecture
The Turing Architecture aims for 30-50% as much performance as the previous-gen Pascal Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Turing TU117-400, more specifically a TU117-300-A1, which has 14 SM activated and thus 896 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1485 MHz and goes up to 1665 MHz with the Boost Clock, the same speed as the reference model.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the memory clock operates at 2000 MHz (8GHz effective).

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required.

Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB will enable low to mid-level graphics performance on modern AAA 2019 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 50+ FPS on medium graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution.
Comparatively, this card has slightly faster performance than the GTX 1050 Ti.

System Suggestions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080, so our recommendation would be to use 19200x1080 in order to get the most out of your settings. We recommend a high-end processor such as the i5-8400 and 8GB of RAM for optimal performance.
Overview
The GeForce GTX 2050 is an expect Nvidia low-end graphics card due to launch in 2019. The GTX 2050 is designed to compete against AMD's more affordable gaming cards such as the RX 550 and the RX 560, and expected to replace the outgoing GTX 1050.

Architecture
The Turing Architecture aims for 30-50% as much performance as the previous-gen Turing Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Turing T107-400 which has [TBA] SM activated and thus [TBA] Shader Processing Units, [TBA] TMUs and [TBA] ROPs. The central unit runs at [TBA]MHz and goes up to [TBA]MHz with the Boost Clock.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the memory clock Operates at 3504MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required.

Performance
The GTX 2050 will enable low to mid-level graphics performance on modern AAA 2018 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 50+ FPS on medium graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution.
Comparatively, this card will have slightly faster performance than the GTX 1050 Ti.

System Suggestions
The GeForce GTX 2050 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080, so our recommendation would be to use 1600x900 in order to get the most out of your settings. We recommend a high-end processor such as the i5-7500 and 8GB of RAM for optimal performance.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-