3.8
Check Prices $169.00
3.6
Check Prices
Estimated Price:
$107.99
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB Radeon RX 560 4GB
Red Dead Redemption 2 18% 38%
Doom Eternal 1% 19%
Cyberpunk 2077 62% 90%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18% 38%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 27% 15%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 62% 90%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 62% 90%
Grand Theft Auto VI 80% 111%
Need For Speed Heat 18% 38%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 95% 95%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB.

The GTX 1650 has a 310 MHz higher core clock speed but 8 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the RX 560. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GTX 1650 manages to provide 8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 1650 has a 310 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Render Output Units than the RX 560. This results in the GTX 1650 providing 28.7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 1650 was released over a year more recently than the RX 560, and so the GTX 1650 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the RX 560.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB and the Radeon RX 560 4GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GTX 1650 has 16.1 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX 560, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 1650 is slightly better than the RX 560.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB has 896 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon RX 560 4GB has 1024. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 1650 is 1546 and the actual shader performance of the RX 560 is 1306. The GTX 1650 having 240 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 1650 delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the RX 560.

The GTX 1650 transistor size technology is 2 nm (nanometers) smaller than the RX 560. This means that the GTX 1650 is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the RX 560.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB requires 75 Watts to run and the Radeon RX 560 4GB requires 80 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 1650 and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the RX 560. The RX 560 requires 5 Watts more than the GTX 1650 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the RX 560 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GTX 1650.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 22 FPS on Control

Control

22 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 18.8 FPS on Control

Control

18.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 31.3 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

31.3 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 26.6 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

26.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 32.3 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

32.3 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 27.5 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

27.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 34.6 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

34.6 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 29.5 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

29.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 41.9 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

41.9 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 35.7 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

35.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 42.1 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

42.1 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 35.9 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

35.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 43.7 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

43.7 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 37.2 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

37.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 43.7 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

43.7 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 37.2 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

37.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 49.1 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

49.1 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 41.9 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

41.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 49.1 FPS on Total War: Warhammer 2

Total War: Warhammer 2

49.1 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 41.9 FPS on Total War: Warhammer 2

Total War: Warhammer 2

41.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 58.3 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

58.3 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 49.7 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

49.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 16.4 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

16.4 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 14 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

14 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 16.4 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

16.4 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 14 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

14 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 19.1 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

19.1 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 16.3 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

16.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 19.4 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

19.4 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 16.6 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

16.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 17.1 FPS on Control

Control

17.1 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 14.5 FPS on Control

Control

14.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 21.7 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

21.7 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 18.5 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

18.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB gets 22.3 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

22.3 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 19 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

19 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1485 MHzvs1175 MHz
Boost Clock1725 MHzvs1275 MHz
ArchitectureTuring T107GCN 1.3 Baffin XT
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs Great
Release Date27 Apr 2019vs18 Apr 2017
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1920x1080
9.5
green tick vs
8.8
2560x1440
7.1
green tick vs
6.4
3840x2160
5.5
green tick vs
4.9

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed2002 MHzvs1750 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth128.1GB/secvs112GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 1024 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs yes
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs1024
Actual Shader Performance74%vs63%
Technology12nmvs14nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs64
Texture Rate83.2 GTexel/svs75.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs16
Pixel Rate47.5 GPixel/svs18.8 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)7680x4320vs5120x2880
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs1
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Wattsvs80 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 27 Ampsvs450 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.0
Shader Model5.4vs-
Open GL4.6vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-8400 6-Core 2.8GHzvsAMD Ryzen R5 1400
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
The GeForce GTX 1650 is an Nvidia GeForce low-end graphics card which launched in April 2019. The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB is designed to compete against AMD's more affordable gaming cards such as the RX 550 and the RX 560, and replaces the outgoing GTX 1050.
This is a dual-slot graphics card which connects to the rest of the system using a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB features a single-fan cooling solution, mini-ITX form factor, and Expertool II compatability. This graphics card has below average overclocking potential. Its small size means this graphics card is an ideal choice for a small-form-factor (SFF) PC build.
Architecture
The Turing Architecture aims for 30-50% as much performance as the previous-gen Pascal Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Turing TU117-400, more specifically a TU117-300-A1, which has 14 SM activated and thus 896 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1485 MHz and goes up to 1725 MHz with the Boost Clock, providing a 4% overclock versus the reference model.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the memory clock operates at 2000 MHz (8GHz effective).

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required.

Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB will enable low to mid-level graphics performance on modern AAA 2019 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 50+ FPS on medium graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution.
Comparatively, this card has slightly faster performance than the GTX 1050 Ti.

System Suggestions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Gainward Pegasus OC 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080, so our recommendation would be to use 19200x1080 in order to get the most out of your settings. We recommend a high-end processor such as the i5-8400 and 8GB of RAM for optimal performance.
Overview
Radeon RX 560 4GB is an Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the 4th Generation of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Polaris 21 which has 16 Compute Units activated and thus 1024 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of Fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock Operates at 1750MHz, 7GHz effective.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 80W, it requires at least a 450W PSU and relies entirely on the PCI Slot for Power, meaning no Extra Connectors are required.

Performance
This graphics card was designed and marketed towards the competitive MOBO gamers. A light weight, small form factor GPU solution that offers mobility, so that gamers travelling to events can bring a smaller cheaper gaming rig. The Radeon RX 560 4GB can play most modern games at medium graphics selection on a 1080p screen res and expect around 45+FPS

System Suggestions
Radeon RX 560 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a Performance Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body