3.8
Check Prices
Estimated Price:
$169.99
2.1
Check Prices $14999.00
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB Quadro Plex 7000
Red Dead Redemption 2 16% 92%
Halo: Reach 63% 39%
Cyberpunk 2077 59% 163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16% 92%
Doom Eternal 1% 65%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 59% 163%
Grand Theft Auto VI 77% 193%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 29% 18%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 59% 163%
Need For Speed Heat 16% 92%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro Plex 7000.

The GTX 1650 has a 911 MHz higher core clock speed but 72 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the Quadro Plex 7000. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GTX 1650 manages to provide 9.7 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 1650 has a 911 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro Plex 7000, but the Quadro Plex 7000 has 64 more Render Output Units than the GTX 1650. As a result, the Quadro Plex 7000 exhibits a 7.6 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 1650. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 1650 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro Plex 7000, and so the GTX 1650 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro Plex 7000 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The Quadro Plex 7000 has 8192 MB more video memory than the GTX 1650, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro Plex 7000 also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro Plex 7000 has 159.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 1650, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro Plex 7000 is massively better than the GTX 1650.

The GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB has 896 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro Plex 7000 has 1024. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 1650 is 1680 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro Plex 7000 is 1176. The GTX 1650 having 504 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Quadro Plex 7000 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GTX 1650 transistor size technology is 28 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro Plex 7000. This means that the GTX 1650 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro Plex 7000.

The GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB requires 75 Watts to run and the Quadro Plex 7000 requires 600 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 1650 and a PSU with at least 900 Watts for the Quadro Plex 7000. The Quadro Plex 7000 requires 525 Watts more than the GTX 1650 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro Plex 7000 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 1650.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 22.4 FPS on Control

Control

22.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 31.8 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

31.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 32.9 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

32.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 35.2 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

35.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 42.6 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

42.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 42.9 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

42.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 44.4 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

44.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 44.4 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

44.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 50 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

50 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 50 FPS on Total War: Warhammer 2

Total War: Warhammer 2

50 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 59.3 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

59.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 16.7 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

16.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 16.7 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

16.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 19.4 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

19.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 19.8 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

19.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 17.4 FPS on Control

Control

17.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 22.1 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

22.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB gets 22.7 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

22.7 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1485 MHzvs574 MHz
Boost Clock1875 MHzvs-
ArchitectureTuring T117Fermi GF100 (x2)
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Poor
Release Date27 Apr 2019vs25 Jul 2011
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
10
green tick vs -
1920x1080
9.5
green tick vs -
2560x1440
7.2
green tick vs -
3840x2160
5.5
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs12288 MB
Memory Speed2002 MHzvs750 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs768 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth128.1GB/secvs288GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 1536 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs1024
Actual Shader Performance81%vs57%
Technology12nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs128
Texture Rate83.2 GTexel/svs73.5 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs96
Pixel Rate47.5 GPixel/svs55.1 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)7680x4320vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs4
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections1vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Wattsvs600 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 27 Ampsvs900 Watts & 60 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.0
Shader Model5.4vs5.0
Open GL4.6vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i7-2700K 4-Core 3.50GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
The GeForce GTX 1650 is an Nvidia GeForce low-end graphics card which launched in April 2019. The GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB is designed to compete against AMD's more affordable gaming cards such as the RX 550 and the RX 560, and replaces the outgoing GTX 1050.
This is a 2.75-slot graphics card which connects to the rest of the system using a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. The GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB features a dual-fan cooling solution, all-metal backplate, and EVGA Precision X1. This graphics card has good overclocking potential.
Architecture
The Turing Architecture aims for 30-50% as much performance as the previous-gen Pascal Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Turing TU117, more specifically a TU117-300-A1, which has 14 SM activated and thus 896 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1485 MHz and goes up to 1875 MHz with the Boost Clock, providing a generous 13% overclock versus the reference model.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the memory clock operates at 2000 MHz (8GHz effective).

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, an additional 6-pin power connector is required. It is recommended you have a 300W or greater Power Supply Unit (PSU).

Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB will enable low to mid-level graphics performance on modern AAA 2019 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 50+ FPS on medium graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution.
Comparatively, this card has slightly faster performance than the GTX 1050 Ti.

System Suggestions
The GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA XC Ultra Gaming 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080, so our recommendation would be to use 19200x1080 in order to get the most out of your settings. We recommend a high-end processor such as the i5-8400 and 8GB of RAM for optimal performance.
Quadro Plex 7000 is an enthusiast professional card based on the 40nm, Fermi architecture.

It's based on 2 Fermi GF100 GPUs and thus offers 1024 Shader Processing Units, 128 TMUs and 96 ROPs, on a 768-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 574MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 750MHz. It has a L2 Cache of 1536KB and a rated board TDP of 600 Watts.

Despite exhibiting similarities to GeForce GTX 590, due to being under-clocked and because Quadro Plex 7000's drivers are only certified for professional applications only, its gaming performance is up to 10% slower than GeForce GTX 590.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body