Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro FX 350M GeForce 8200M G
Halo: Reach 4828% 4622%
Cyberpunk 2077 21204% 20317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15407% 14761%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 9465% 9067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 15407% 14761%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 21204% 20317%
Doom Eternal 13233% 12678%
Grand Theft Auto VI 23596% 22608%
FIFA 20 8161% 7817%
Need For Speed Heat 15407% 14761%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 8200M G are marginally better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 350M.

The GeForce 8200M G was released over a year more recently than the Quadro FX 350M, and so the GeForce 8200M G is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro FX 350M.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro FX 350M has 256 MB video memory, but the GeForce 8200M G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 8200M G has 8 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 350M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Quadro FX 350M requires 15 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce 8200M G.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed450 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureG72GLM-
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date31 Mar 2006vs01 Jun 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory256 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed350 MHzvs-
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vs-
Memory Bandwidth5.6GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs8
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections-vs1
DVI Connections-vs1
HDMI Connections-vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power15 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs10
Shader Model4.0vs4.0
Open GL2.1vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.GeForce 8400M GT is an on-board GPU part of the 8000M Series released by NVIDIA, in 2007.
Only less demanding games can be played smoothly.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body