Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon RX Vega 8 GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition
Red Dead Redemption 2 171% 180%
Cyberpunk 2077 272% 285%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 67% 73%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 272% 285%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 171% 180%
Doom Eternal 133% 141%
FIFA 20 44% 49%
Grand Theft Auto VI 314% 329%
Need For Speed Heat 171% 180%
Halo: Reach 14% 11%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition.

The RX Vega has a 6 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 560. This results in the RX Vega providing 22.7 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The RX Vega has a 6 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 560 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the RX Vega providing 0.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The RX Vega was released over three years more recently than the GTX 560, and so the RX Vega is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 560 when running the latest games.

The RX Vega has 3072 MB more video memory than the GTX 560, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the RX Vega also has superior memory performance overall.

The RX Vega has 224 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 560, which means that the memory performance of the RX Vega is massively better than the GTX 560.

The Radeon RX Vega 8 has 1280 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition has 336. However, the actual shader performance of the RX Vega is 841 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 560 is 622. The RX Vega having 219 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the RX Vega delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 560.

The RX Vega transistor size technology is 26 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 560. This means that the RX Vega is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 560. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the RX Vega should consume less power than the GTX 560.

The GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition requires 150 Watts to run but there is no entry for the RX Vega. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the RX Vega and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 560. The GTX 560 has been recommended a PSU with 50 Watts more than the RX Vega. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 560 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the RX Vega.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

Radeon RX Vega 8 gets 8 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

8 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 8 gets 5.1 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

5.1 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 8 gets 2.1 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

2.1 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed931 MHzvs925 MHz
Boost Clock1011 MHzvs-
ArchitectureVegaFermi GF114-325-A1
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Poor
Release Date28 Feb 2018vs19 May 2011
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
9.9
vs green tick
10
1600x900
8
green tick vs
7.9
1920x1080
6.2
green tick vs
6.1
2560x1440
4.6
green tick vs
4.1
3840x2160
3.1
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs1024 MB
Memory Speed1400 MHzvs1050 MHz
Memory Bus1024 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeHBM-2vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth358.4GB/secvs134.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1280vs336
Actual Shader Performance40%vs30%
Technology14nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units80vs56
Texture Rate74.5 GTexel/svs51.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs32
Pixel Rate29.8 GPixel/svs29.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-150 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Wattsvs450 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12vs12.0
Shader Model-vs5.0
Open GL-vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i5-2300 2.8GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview Radeon RX Vega M GL is a dedicated Graphics processor found in Intel's Desktop 8th Gen G-Series CPUs. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed Vega M which offers 20 Compute Units, 80 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 931MHz and goes up to 1011MHz in Turbo Mode. Memory The GPU utilises its own onboard HBM2 memory. Radeon RX Vega M GH has 4GB of second-generation High Bandwidth Memory, clocked at 1.4Gb/s. Sat on a 1024-bit memory interface, this provides total memory bandwidth of 179.2GB/s. Performance The Most Powerful Variant Offers Performance similar to a dedicated GeForce GTX 1050. Select the Specific Version you have of this Graphics Card According to your Processor for a more Accurate Rank and experience using our tools. System Suggestions We recommend 8GB of RAM for a system with Radeon RX Vega M GH.Overview
GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of NVIDIA's Performance GeForce GTX 560, created by Asus.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit now runs at 925MHz, instead of 810MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock is now of 1050MHz, instead of 1002MHz.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.


Cooling Solution
DirectCU II: Copper heat pipes in direct contact with the GPU to speed up heat dissipation for over 20% cooler performance, DirectCU II takes cooling further with twin 80mm fans for doubled airflow.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate a 9% Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GTX 560.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body