Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 6200 GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Cyberpunk 2077 19383% 20079%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 17719% 18355%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 17141% 17757%
FIFA 21 9728% 10079%
Watch Dogs Legion 18693% 19364%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 17141% 17757%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 27831% 28829%
Grand Theft Auto VI 27314% 28293%
Godfall 31538% 32668%
Genshin Impact 19383% 20079%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 6200 are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache was released over a year more recently than the GeForce 6200, and so the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce 6200.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 6200 has 128 MB more video memory than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce 6200 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce 6200 has 6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 6200 is marginally better than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The GeForce 6200 has 4 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6200 is 1 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is 2. The GeForce 6200 TurboCache having 1 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GeForce 6200 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV43NV44
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date02 Jan 2004vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory256 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed275 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth8.8GB/secvs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs7
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs9.0c
Shader Model3.0vs3.0
Open GL1.5vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications. The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-