Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB GeForce GTX 780 Gainward Phantom GLH Edition
Halo: Reach 78% 64%
Cyberpunk 2077 5% 55%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 57% 30%
Red Dead Redemption 2 31% 13%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 31% 13%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 5% 55%
Doom Eternal 40% 3%
Grand Theft Auto VI 6% 72%
FIFA 20 63% 40%
Need For Speed Heat 31% 13%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Gainward Phantom GLH Edition.

The RX Vega has a 520 MHz higher core clock speed and 64 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 780. This results in the RX Vega providing 195.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The RX Vega has a 520 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Render Output Units than the GTX 780. This results in the RX Vega providing 49 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The RX Vega was released over three years more recently than the GTX 780, and so the RX Vega is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 780 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The RX Vega has 5120 MB more video memory than the GTX 780, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GTX 780 has superior memory performance.

The GTX 780 has 32.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX Vega, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 780 is noticeably better than the RX Vega.

The Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB has 4096 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 780 Gainward Phantom GLH Edition has 2304. However, the actual shader performance of the RX Vega is 3994 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 780 is 2380. The RX Vega having 1614 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the RX Vega delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 780.

The RX Vega transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 780. This means that the RX Vega is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 780.

The Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB requires 200 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 780 Gainward Phantom GLH Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the RX Vega and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX 780. The two GPUs have been recommended a PSU with the same amount of wattage. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 45.9 FPS on Total War: Three Kingdoms

Total War: Three Kingdoms

45.9 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 53 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

53 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 56 FPS on Control

Control

56 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 59.2 FPS on Metro: Exodus

Metro: Exodus

59.2 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 60.7 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

60.7 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 63.7 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

63.7 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 64.3 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

64.3 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 66.3 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

66.3 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 74.7 FPS on Assassins Creed: Odyssey

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

74.7 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 78.2 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

78.2 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 78.3 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

78.3 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 78.4 FPS on Assassins Creed: Unity

Assassins Creed: Unity

78.4 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 81.6 FPS on Total War: Warhammer 2

Total War: Warhammer 2

81.6 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 83.6 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

83.6 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 84.5 FPS on Select a game

Select a game

84.5 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 88 FPS on Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

88 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 92.8 FPS on Middle-earth: Shadow of War

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

92.8 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 96.9 FPS on Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider

96.9 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 105.6 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

105.6 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 106.7 FPS on Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

106.7 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 112.5 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

112.5 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 130.4 FPS on Forza Horizon 4

Forza Horizon 4

130.4 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 146.7 FPS on Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1

146.7 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 169.3 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

169.3 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 35.9 FPS on Control

Control

35.9 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 41.2 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

41.2 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 42.8 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

42.8 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 43.1 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

43.1 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 47.2 FPS on Metro: Exodus

Metro: Exodus

47.2 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 49.5 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

49.5 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 57.4 FPS on Assassins Creed: Unity

Assassins Creed: Unity

57.4 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 60.6 FPS on Assassins Creed: Odyssey

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

60.6 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 60.8 FPS on Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

60.8 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 62.4 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

62.4 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 67.3 FPS on Hitman 2 (2018)

Hitman 2 (2018)

67.3 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 76 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

76 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 76.3 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

76.3 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 76.8 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

76.8 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 96.2 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

96.2 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 98.4 FPS on Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

98.4 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 104.1 FPS on Forza Horizon 4

Forza Horizon 4

104.1 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 107.3 FPS on Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1

107.3 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 113.5 FPS on Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider

113.5 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 16.5 FPS on Total War: Three Kingdoms

Total War: Three Kingdoms

16.5 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 17.8 FPS on Control

Control

17.8 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 22.9 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

22.9 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 26.4 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

26.4 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 27.2 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

27.2 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 27.3 FPS on Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

27.3 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 27.3 FPS on Assassins Creed: Unity

Assassins Creed: Unity

27.3 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 27.3 FPS on Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

27.3 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 27.5 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

27.5 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 27.7 FPS on Metro: Exodus

Metro: Exodus

27.7 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 30.8 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

30.8 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 32.3 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

32.3 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 32.6 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

32.6 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 34.7 FPS on Hitman 2 (2018)

Hitman 2 (2018)

34.7 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 35.5 FPS on Assassins Creed: Odyssey

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

35.5 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 36.7 FPS on Crysis 3

Crysis 3

36.7 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 42.8 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

42.8 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 46.8 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

46.8 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 49.3 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

49.3 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 52.7 FPS on Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

52.7 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 57.5 FPS on Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider

57.5 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 64 FPS on Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1

64 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB gets 67 FPS on Forza Horizon 4

Forza Horizon 4

67 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1500 MHzvs980 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1033 MHz
ArchitectureVega 10 XTKepler GK110-300-A1
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Good
Release Date30 Sep 2017vs30 Jun 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1920x1080
10
green tick vs
9.6
2560x1440
9.2
green tick vs
7.2
3840x2160
7.1
green tick vs
5.4

GPU Memory

Memory8192 MBvs3072 MB
Memory Speed500 MHzvs1502 MHz
Memory Bus2048 Bitvs384 Bit
Memory TypeHBM-2vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth256GB/secvs288.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 1536 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4096vs2304
Actual Shader Performance100%vs100%
Technology14nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units256vs192
Texture Rate384 GTexel/svs188.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units64vs48
Pixel Rate96 GPixel/svs47 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)3840x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections3vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power200 Watts-
Recommended PSU600 Watts & 42 Ampsvs600 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM16 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution3840x2160vs2560x1440

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB is an Enthusiast gaming small form factor (SFF) Graphics Card based on the Fourth (4.0) Revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

Architecture
The Vega 10 Pro GPU offers support for HBM-2 Memory, DirectX 12.0 and Open GL 4.5. While the Radeon RX Vega Eclipse and Nova use a slightly faster Vega 10 XT GPU, the Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB will still likely offer performance faster than a GeForce GTX 1070 yet slower than a GTX 1080. Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB GPU has 64 Compute Units activated, offering 4096 Shader Processing Units, 256 TMUs and 64 ROPs. This puts its performance roughly in line with $350 GeForce GTX 1070.

GPU
The Central Unit is clocked at 1500MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with stacked HBM-2 Memory and accesses the Frame Buffer through a 2048-bit memory interface.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 8GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However,the GPU itself is aimed for 1440p Gaming. The RX Vega Core's performance at this resolution should be excellent, however users with 4K displays may find it bottlenecks performance.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 200W, it requires at least a 550W PSU with two available 8-pin connectors.

Performance
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB competes with the GeForce GTX 1070 8GB, which is available for $349.
However, the ultra-wide HBM2 memory may offer the Radeon RX Vega an advantage at higher resolutions, while the SFF means it can excell if mini-ITX builds.
System Suggestions
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB HBM2 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 2560 x1440 (1440p). We recommend a Very Strong Processor and at least 16GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.is
GeForce GTX 780 Gainward Phantom GLH Edition is a special edition of the high-end GeForce GTX 780.
This edition comes with a custom triple fan cooling solution which by itself should allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 780 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Also, it has been overclocked out of the box from 863MHz to 980MHz while its boost clock is now of 1033MHz. The memory clock was also increased to 1550MHz.
Benchmarks indicate a 8% performance boost when compared to the reference card.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body