Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 320M Mobility Radeon X700
Red Dead Redemption 2 2278% 3681%
Doom Eternal 1944% 3151%
Cyberpunk 2077 3167% 5094%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2278% 3681%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1367% 2232%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 3167% 5094%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 3167% 5094%
Grand Theft Auto VI 3533% 5677%
Need For Speed Heat 2278% 3681%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 8% 46%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 320M are significantly better than the AMD Mobility Radeon X700.

The GeForce 320M was released over three years more recently than the Mobility Radeon X700, and so the GeForce 320M is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Mobility Radeon X700 when running the latest games.

The Mobility Radeon X700 has 128 MB video memory, but the GeForce 320M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 320M has 48 Shader Processing Units and the Mobility Radeon X700 has 6. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 320M is 45 and the actual shader performance of the Mobility Radeon X700 is 1. The GeForce 320M having 44 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 320M delivers a slightly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Mobility Radeon X700.

The GeForce 320M requires 23 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Mobility Radeon X700.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed450 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureTesla MCP89RV410
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support Poor vs -
Release Date01 Apr 2010vs01 Mar 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
2.4
green tick vs -
1920x1080
1.7
green tick vs -
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160
0.1
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed667 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth21.3GB/secvs11.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units48vs6
Actual Shader Performance2%vs0%
Technology40nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units16vs-
Texture Rate7.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units8vs-
Pixel Rate3.6 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power23 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10.0vs9.0b
Shader Model4.1vs2.0
Open GL3.3vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-M330 2.13GHz-
Recommended RAM2 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1024x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 320M is an Integrated Mobile Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Tesla Architecture.

Architecture
Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Tesla MCP89 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 48 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 450MHz.

Memory
The GPU also Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 256MB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Features
DirectX 10.1 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 14W, it may be used on very small notebooks.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance considerably above the desktop GeForce 210.
Notebook PCs based on AMD's mainstream notebook platform are designed to deliver real entertainment with the ultimate in HD visual performance. Superior technologies are optimized to create an immersive visual experience with improved graphics performance, fast wireless and long battery life. Add in more notebook PC choices from leading PC manufacturers and you get an incredible value one that you can only get from AMD.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body