Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 320M Quadro FX 1700M
Cyberpunk 2077 3167% 2334%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2278% 1672%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1367% 993%
Halo: Reach 656% 463%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 3167% 2334%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2278% 1672%
FIFA 20 1167% 844%
Doom Eternal 1944% 1423%
Grand Theft Auto VI 3533% 2607%
Need For Speed Heat 2278% 1672%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 1700M are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 320M.

The GeForce 320M was released over a year more recently than the Quadro FX 1700M, and so the GeForce 320M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro FX 1700M.

The Quadro FX 1700M has 512 MB video memory, but the GeForce 320M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 320M has 48 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 1700M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 320M requires 23 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 1700M requires 50 Watts. The Quadro FX 1700M requires 27 Watts more than the GeForce 320M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Quadro FX 1700M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 320M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed450 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureTesla MCP89G96M
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support Poor vs -
Release Date01 Apr 2010vs01 Oct 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
2.4
green tick vs -
1920x1080
1.7
green tick vs -
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160
0.1
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs512 MB
Memory Speed667 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth21.3GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units48vs-
Actual Shader Performance2%vs-
Technology40nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units16vs-
Texture Rate7.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units8vs-
Pixel Rate3.6 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power23 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10.0vs10
Shader Model4.1vs4.0
Open GL3.3vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-M330 2.13GHz-
Recommended RAM2 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1024x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 320M is an Integrated Mobile Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Tesla Architecture.

Architecture
Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Tesla MCP89 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 48 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 450MHz.

Memory
The GPU also Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 256MB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Features
DirectX 10.1 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 14W, it may be used on very small notebooks.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance considerably above the desktop GeForce 210.
The Quadro® FX 1700M mid-range mobile workstation graphics solution with its revolutionary unified architecture, delivers 512MB of memory, exceptional image quality, and highly optimized visual computing application performance that pushes the performance limits of a 15.4” mobile workstation. The reference standard for OpenGL 2.1, DirectX 10, and Shader Model 4.0, Quadro FX 1700M enables next generation applications with new levels of interactivity to meet the demands of CAD engineers, graphics designers, and other technical design professionals.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body